NGC 1758
(OCL 453; MWSC 463; FoF 2266)
0.93
UTI
0.88
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
50.5 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.88 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
NGC 1758 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a moderate percentage of members with at least one entry reported in the same catalogue. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999β | 76.184 | 23.816 | 1.112 | 3.116 | -3.485 | 3.547 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 76.175 | 23.813 | 1.103 | 3.156 | -3.465 | β |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 76.188 | 23.813 | β | β | β | β |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 76.173 | 23.811 | 1.114 | 3.102 | -3.496 | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 76.176 | 23.811 | β | β | β | β |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 76.186 | 23.819 | 1.084 | 3.127 | -3.507 | β |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 76.175 | 23.813 | β | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 76.175 | 23.813 | 1.134 | 3.125 | -3.489 | 2.041 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 76.188 | 23.813 | 1.125 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 76.175 | 23.813 | 1.134 | 3.125 | -3.489 | 2.041 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 76.178 | 23.813 | β | β | β | β |
| He et al. | 2022 | 76.18 | 23.81 | 1.124 | 3.128 | -3.497 | β |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 76.173 | 23.821 | 1.119 | 3.126 | -3.493 | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 76.176 | 23.811 | 1.102 | 3.156 | -3.47 | 17.84 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 76.175 | 23.813 | 1.103 | 3.156 | -3.465 | β |
| SΓ‘nchez et al. | 2020 | 76.146 | 23.798 | β | 3.13 | -3.365 | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 76.175 | 23.813 | 1.103 | 3.156 | -3.465 | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 76.2 | 23.798 | 1.102 | 3.148 | -3.474 | β |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 76.175 | 23.813 | β | β | β | β |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 76.167 | 23.806 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 76.175 | 23.813 | 1.103 | 3.156 | -3.465 | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 76.14 | 23.799 | β | -0.068 | 1.335 | β |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 76.146 | 23.798 | β | -0.61 | -3.57 | β |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 76.1 | 23.783 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 76.146 | 23.798 | β | -0.61 | -3.57 | β |
π‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999β | 0.865 | 1.05 | 0.69 | 541 | 0.049 | 416 | 0.47 | β |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.81 | 0.97 | β | 784 | -0.043 | β | β | β |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | β | β | β | β | -0.160(5) | β | β | β |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 1.85 | 1.32 | β | 562 | 0.500 | 429 | 0.49 | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.86 | 1.20 | β | 541 | β | 404 | β | β |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.89 | 0.93 | β | 530 | 0.097 | β | β | β |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | β | β | β | β | -0.080(1) | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | β | β | β | β | β | 685(1) | β | β |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.91 | 1.06 | β | 646 | 0.360 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.84 | 1.01 | 0.69 | 305 | β | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.85 | 1.27 | β | 552 | -0.018 | 333(1) | 0.45 | β |
| He et al. | 2022 | β | 1.25 | β | 708 | β | β | β | β |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.87 | β | β | 295 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.86 | 1.20 | β | 541 | 0.098 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.89 | 0.93 | β | 275 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.88 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | β | β | β | 355 | 0.250 | β | β | β |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 0.93 | 0.93 | β | 551 | 0.000 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.88 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.62 | 1.01 | β | 542 | β | β | β | β |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 0.76 | 1.05 | β | 398 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.76 | 1.05 | β | 398 | β | β | β | β |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.