NGC 1750
(OCL 454; MWSC 462; FoF 2267)
1.0
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
28.8 [N/pc2]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
π₯ Members
π Colab
π¬ Bayestar19
MOCA
π CDS
π Simbad
π CDS (Ξ±, Ξ΄)
π Simbad (Ξ±, Ξ΄)
MOCA
π CDS
π Simbad
π CDS (Ξ±, Ξ΄)
π Simbad (Ξ±, Ξ΄)
Overview
NGC 1750 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a large percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999β | 75.937 | 23.681 | 1.383 | -0.997 | -2.401 | -10.339 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 75.926 | 23.695 | 1.361 | -0.96 | -2.366 | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 75.933 | 23.691 | β | β | β | β |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 75.911 | 23.671 | 1.348 | -1.016 | -2.404 | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 75.981 | 23.691 | β | β | β | β |
| Cordoni et al. | 2023 | 75.933 | 23.691 | 1.353 | -0.945 | -2.386 | β |
| He et al. | 2022 | 75.957 | 23.678 | 1.383 | -1.006 | -2.411 | β |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 75.909 | 23.695 | 1.396 | -1.008 | -2.407 | β |
| Richer et al. | 2021 | 75.945 | 23.69 | 1.348 | -0.941 | -2.378 | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 75.933 | 23.691 | 1.353 | -0.945 | -2.386 | -9.744 |
| Spina et al. | 2021 | 75.94 | 23.69 | 1.359 | -0.939 | -2.386 | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 75.926 | 23.695 | 1.361 | -0.96 | -2.366 | β |
| SΓ‘nchez et al. | 2020 | 75.979 | 23.658 | β | -0.771 | -2.376 | β |
| Zhong et al. | 2020 | 75.926 | 23.695 | β | -0.96 | -2.366 | -19.986 |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 75.926 | 23.695 | 1.361 | -0.96 | -2.366 | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 76.022 | 23.629 | 1.359 | -0.919 | -2.393 | β |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 75.926 | 23.695 | β | β | β | β |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 75.926 | 23.695 | β | β | β | -10.38 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 75.988 | 23.674 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 75.926 | 23.695 | 1.361 | -0.96 | -2.366 | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 75.975 | 23.658 | β | -0.608 | -1.281 | β |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 75.979 | 23.658 | β | -2.57 | -3.1 | β |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 75.979 | 23.658 | β | β | β | β |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 75.975 | 23.65 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 75.979 | 23.658 | β | -3.14 | -2.91 | β |
π‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999β | 0.71 | 1.11 | β | 200 | 0.000 | 1022 | 0.34 | 0.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.66 | 1.11 | β | 163 | -0.042 | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.71 | 1.24 | β | 198 | β | 1097 | β | β |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.73 | 0.79 | β | 450 | 0.060 | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.69 | 1.24 | β | 154 | -0.001 | 705(1) | 0.45 | β |
| Cordoni et al. | 2023 | 0.71 | 1.24 | β | 198 | 0.060 | 1022 | 0.23 | 0.00 |
| He et al. | 2022 | β | 1.40 | β | 79 | β | β | β | β |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.71 | β | β | 282 | β | β | β | β |
| Richer et al. | 2021 | β | 1.11 | β | 257 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.71 | 1.24 | β | 198 | 0.060 | β | β | β |
| Spina et al. | 2021 | 0.74 | β | β | 257 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.73 | 0.79 | β | 257 | β | β | β | β |
| Zhong et al. | 2020 | 0.63 | 1.05 | β | 8300 | -0.062 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.72 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | β | β | β | 66 | 0.250 | β | β | β |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 0.65 | 0.66 | β | 414 | 0.000 | β | β | β |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.72 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.72 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.51 | 1.16 | β | 508 | β | β | β | β |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 0.63 | β | β | 200 | -0.690 | β | β | β |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 0.63 | 1.05 | β | 200 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.63 | 1.05 | β | 200 | β | β | β | β |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
Richer et al. (2021)
The expected number of WDs is 28.7, 0 WD candidates found, and 0 WD candidates found in the wide search.
Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.