NGC 1708

(MWSC 458; FoF 2259)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.91 UTI
0.78
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 12.9 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.78 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
NGC 1708 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 75.875 52.834 1.047 0.189 -1.422 -7.697
Li et al. 2025 75.871 52.851 1.029 0.276 -1.36 –
Almeida et al. 2025 75.882 52.846 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 75.871 52.866 1.008 0.186 -1.438 –
Zhang et al. 2024 75.885 52.922 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 75.885 52.922 1.044 0.197 -1.417 -7.393
Cavallo et al. 2024 75.875 52.829 1.043 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 75.885 52.922 1.044 0.197 -1.417 -7.393
Almeida et al. 2023 75.891 52.841 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 75.848 52.865 – – – –
He et al. 2022 75.843 52.844 1.046 0.186 -1.432 –
Tarricq et al. 2022 75.866 52.91 1.044 0.174 -1.433 –
Dias et al. 2021 75.882 52.846 1.025 0.274 -1.362 -25.771
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 75.871 52.851 1.029 0.276 -1.36 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 75.871 52.851 1.029 0.276 -1.36 –
Liu & Pang 2019 75.835 52.827 1.029 0.278 -1.429 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 75.871 52.851 – – – 7.2
Bica et al. 2019 75.851 52.857 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 75.871 52.851 1.029 0.276 -1.36 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 75.84 52.865 – -0.269 -0.177 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 75.848 52.865 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 75.862 52.833 – -3.21 0.18 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 75.859 52.865 – -2.95 0.6 –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 75.859 52.865 – -2.95 0.6 –
Piskunov et al. 2008 75.837 52.851 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2007 75.837 52.851 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 75.85 52.85 – -3.52 0.39 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 0.81 1.29 – 430 -0.057 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.90 1.55 – 172 – 454 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.97 1.02 – 471 0.143 – – –
Zhang et al. 2024 – – – – -0.077* – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 481* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.00 1.48 – 214 0.510 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.90 1.54 2.11 105 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 0.91 1.77 – 198 -0.175 390* 0.65 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 569 – 12 – –
He et al. 2022 – 1.90 – 40 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 0.94 – – 295 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 0.90 1.55 – 172 0.143 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.97 1.02 – 269 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.94 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 331 0.250 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 0.94 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 0.94 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 1.64 1.34 – 398 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 0.63 0.93 – 569 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 0.63 0.93 – 569 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 0.63 0.93 – 569 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 0.60 0.99 – 575 – 112* – –
Piskunov et al. 2007 0.60 0.99 – 575 – 22 – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 0.60 0.99 – 575 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸