NGC 1708
(MWSC 458; FoF 2259)
0.91
UTI
0.78
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
12.9 [arcmin]
- CN 0.78 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
NGC 1708 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 75.875 | 52.834 | 1.047 | 0.189 | -1.422 | -7.697 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 75.871 | 52.851 | 1.029 | 0.276 | -1.36 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 75.882 | 52.846 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 75.871 | 52.866 | 1.008 | 0.186 | -1.438 | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 75.885 | 52.922 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 75.885 | 52.922 | 1.044 | 0.197 | -1.417 | -7.393 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 75.875 | 52.829 | 1.043 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 75.885 | 52.922 | 1.044 | 0.197 | -1.417 | -7.393 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 75.891 | 52.841 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 75.848 | 52.865 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 75.843 | 52.844 | 1.046 | 0.186 | -1.432 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 75.866 | 52.91 | 1.044 | 0.174 | -1.433 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 75.882 | 52.846 | 1.025 | 0.274 | -1.362 | -25.771 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 75.871 | 52.851 | 1.029 | 0.276 | -1.36 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 75.871 | 52.851 | 1.029 | 0.276 | -1.36 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 75.835 | 52.827 | 1.029 | 0.278 | -1.429 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 75.871 | 52.851 | â | â | â | 7.2 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 75.851 | 52.857 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 75.871 | 52.851 | 1.029 | 0.276 | -1.36 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 75.84 | 52.865 | â | -0.269 | -0.177 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 75.848 | 52.865 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 75.862 | 52.833 | â | -3.21 | 0.18 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 75.859 | 52.865 | â | -2.95 | 0.6 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 75.859 | 52.865 | â | -2.95 | 0.6 | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 75.837 | 52.851 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 75.837 | 52.851 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 75.85 | 52.85 | â | -3.52 | 0.39 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.81 | 1.29 | â | 430 | -0.057 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.90 | 1.55 | â | 172 | â | 454 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.97 | 1.02 | â | 471 | 0.143 | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.077* | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 481* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.00 | 1.48 | â | 214 | 0.510 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.90 | 1.54 | 2.11 | 105 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.91 | 1.77 | â | 198 | -0.175 | 390* | 0.65 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 569 | â | 12 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 1.90 | â | 40 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.94 | â | â | 295 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.90 | 1.55 | â | 172 | 0.143 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.97 | 1.02 | â | 269 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.94 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 331 | 0.250 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.94 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.94 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.64 | 1.34 | â | 398 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.63 | 0.93 | â | 569 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.63 | 0.93 | â | 569 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 0.63 | 0.93 | â | 569 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.60 | 0.99 | â | 575 | â | 112* | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.60 | 0.99 | â | 575 | â | 22 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.60 | 0.99 | â | 575 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.