NGC 1624

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.66 UTI
0.44
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.38
CC3
0.75
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 5.1 [N/pc2]
  • CN 0.44 Poorly populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.38 Low quality
  • Clit 0.75 Well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
NGC 1624 is a poorly populated, very dense object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 70.164 50.459 0.187 -0.048 -0.441 19.157
Li et al. 2025 70.162 50.458 0.145 0.006 -0.456 –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 70.162 50.458 0.193 -0.047 -0.431 –
Celli et al. 2024 70.15 50.462 – – – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 70.157 50.451 0.197 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 70.162 50.458 0.193 -0.047 -0.431 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 70.162 50.458 0.145 0.006 -0.456 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 70.15 50.462 – 0.162 -0.39 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 70.162 50.458 0.145 0.006 -0.456 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 70.162 50.458 0.145 0.006 -0.456 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 70.155 50.463 – -0.436 -0.072 –
Dias et al. 2014 70.15 50.462 – -0.08 0.29 –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 70.162 50.46 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 70.15 50.462 – -0.78 -0.54 –

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 5.045 2.485 1.54 22 -0.232 354 – –
Li et al. 2025 2.36 1.79 – 956 -0.194 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 354(1) – –
Celli et al. 2024 – – – 4 – 312 – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.68 2.39 – 62 -0.270 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 4.33 2.58 1.54 21 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 5.76 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 5.76 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 2.57 1.28 – 263 – – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2012 – – – – – 820 – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 6.55(1) 2.73 – 22 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 6.00 2.85 – 4 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️