NGC 1579
0.38
UTI
0.82
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.65
Clit
0.5
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
126.6 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.82 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.65 Moderately studied
- Cdup 0.5 Likely unique
Overview
NGC 1579 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Note: This is likely a unique object, which shares a moderate percentage of members with at least one previously reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 67.533 | 35.298 | 1.823 | 2.497 | -5.021 | 6.345 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 67.493 | 35.366 | â | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 67.523 | 35.282 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 67.523 | 35.282 | 1.879 | 2.422 | -5.159 | 9.373 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 67.514 | 35.325 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 67.448 | 35.372 | 1.877 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 67.523 | 35.282 | 1.879 | 2.422 | -5.159 | 9.373 |
| He et al. | 2022 | 67.519 | 35.285 | 1.849 | 2.443 | -5.097 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 67.493 | 35.366 | 1.765 | 2.473 | -4.976 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 67.514 | 35.325 | 1.81 | 2.477 | -4.945 | â |
| Zhong et al. | 2020 | 67.514 | 35.325 | â | 2.477 | -4.945 | -12.137 |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 67.514 | 35.325 | 1.81 | 2.477 | -4.945 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 67.514 | 35.325 | 1.81 | 2.477 | -4.945 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 0.54 | 3.69 | 2.85 | 8 | 0.143 | 235 | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.56 | 3.73 | â | 8 | â | 226 | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | 0.212(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 272(1) | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 4 | â | 235 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.81 | 3.41 | â | 10 | -0.060 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.51 | 3.65 | 2.85 | 19 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 3.90 | â | 2 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.56 | 3.73 | â | 8 | 0.190 | â | â | â |
| Zhong et al. | 2020 | 0.00 | 0.00 | â | 0 | 0.096 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.54 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.54 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Cavallo et al. (2024)
Wood sample.
Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.