NGC 1348

(MWSC 289; OCL 391; FSR 0650)

0.90 UTI

0.74

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

C3 classification AB

Number of members (P>50%) 97

Radius (P>50% members) 3.1 [arcmin]

C_N 0.74 Moderately populated
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

NGC 1348 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

🔍 Search references for NGC 1348 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	–	53.539	51.403	0.439	1.258	-0.775	-24.137
Almeida et al.	2025	53.526	51.414	–	–	–	–
Zhang et al.	2024	53.545	51.4	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	53.545	51.4	0.442	1.239	-0.775	-19.885
Cavallo et al.	2024	53.495	51.411	0.444	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	53.545	51.4	0.442	1.239	-0.775	-19.885
Just et al.	2023	53.538	51.399	–	–	–	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	53.543	51.399	0.443	1.276	-0.73	–
Rain et al.	2021	53.524	51.409	0.404	1.288	-0.726	–
Dias et al.	2021	53.526	51.414	0.395	1.312	-0.686	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	53.524	51.409	0.404	1.288	-0.726	–
Sánchez et al.	2020	53.525	51.408	–	1.481	-0.84	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	53.524	51.409	0.404	1.288	-0.726	–
Bica et al.	2019	53.535	51.415	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	53.524	51.409	0.404	1.288	-0.726	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	53.52	51.409	–	1.094	-3.514	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	53.538	51.399	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	53.525	51.408	–	0.59	-0.45	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	53.55	51.4	–	1.92	-3.35	–
Gozha et al.	2012	53.525	51.408	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	53.55	51.4	–	1.92	-3.35	–
Chen et al.	2003	53.522	51.421	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	53.525	51.408	–	0.59	-0.45	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	Bfr	BSS
Almeida et al.	2025	2.09	2.84	–	12	–	609	–	–
Zhang et al.	2024	–	–	–	–	0.000*	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	830*	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	2.54	3.04	–	34	0.640	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	2.05	3.08	2.47	56	–	–	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	282	–	27	–	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	2.24*	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Rain et al.	2021	2.31	3.16	–	129	–	–	–	0
Dias et al.	2021	2.09	2.84	–	12	-0.197	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	2.40	2.55	–	42	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	2.31	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	2.31	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	1.33	2.93	–	179	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	1.80	2.63	–	282	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	1.80	2.63	–	282	0.070	–	–	–
Gozha et al.	2012	1.82	–	–	129	0.070	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	1.80	2.63	–	282	0.070	–	–	–
Chen et al.	2003	1.82	3.16	–	130	0.070*	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	1.82	3.16	–	129	0.070	–	–	–

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3