Moffat 1

(MWSC 2346; C1557-540)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.81 UTI
0.38
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.82
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 2.5 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.38 Poorly populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 0.82 Well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Moffat 1 is a poorly populated, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a metal-rich, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close Moderate extinction Metal-rich Very young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Silver sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 240.403 -54.144 0.402 -2.294 -3.029 -49.562
Almeida et al. 2025 240.41 -54.151 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 240.399 -54.146 0.396 -2.318 -3.019 -51.7
Cavallo et al. 2024 240.403 -54.146 0.401 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 240.399 -54.146 0.396 -2.318 -3.019 -51.7
Just et al. 2023 240.363 -54.116 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 240.41 -54.151 0.404 -2.225 -3.018 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 240.397 -54.149 0.402 -2.211 -3.037 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 240.397 -54.149 0.402 -2.211 -3.037 –
Bica et al. 2019 240.399 -54.143 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 240.397 -54.149 0.402 -2.211 -3.037 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 240.363 -54.116 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 240.375 -54.117 – -3.8 -4.41 -42.0
Kharchenko et al. 2013 240.375 -54.117 – 0.52 -0.76 -42.0
van den Bergh 2006 240.375 -54.133 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 240.375 -54.117 – -3.8 -4.41 -42.0

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Almeida et al. 2025 2.51 2.41 – 6 – 112 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 941* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.76 2.00 – 32 0.520 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.27 2.99 2.61 16 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 6 – 90 – –
Dias et al. 2021 2.51 2.41 – 6 0.500 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.28 2.02 – 78 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.32 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.32 – – – – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.12 2.90 – 6 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.12 2.90 – 6 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 3.30 5.70 – 4 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 2.10 3.10 – 10 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸