Melotte 79

(Collinder 169; VDBH 15; NGC 2489; MWSC 1386; OCL 690; vdBergh-Hagen 15; ESO 430 03; FSR 1330; FoF 200)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.98 UTI
0.89
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 68.1 [N/pc2]
  • CN 0.89 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
Melotte 79 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 119.066 -30.061 0.496 -2.523 2.163 37.752
Li et al. 2025 119.064 -30.06 0.465 -2.529 2.102 –
Wei et al. 2025 119.078 -30.066 0.497 -2.504 2.16 –
Almeida et al. 2025 119.065 -30.06 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 119.067 -30.063 0.499 -2.525 2.168 46.534
Cavallo et al. 2024 119.065 -30.062 0.498 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 119.067 -30.063 0.499 -2.525 2.168 46.534
Almeida et al. 2023 119.057 -30.065 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 119.072 -30.063 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 119.064 -30.062 0.493 -2.527 2.109 –
Rain et al. 2021 119.064 -30.06 0.465 -2.529 2.102 –
Dias et al. 2021 119.065 -30.06 0.47 -2.53 2.084 38.798
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 119.064 -30.06 0.465 -2.529 2.102 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 119.062 -30.063 – -2.478 2.125 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 119.064 -30.06 0.465 -2.529 2.102 –
Liu & Pang 2019 119.064 -30.057 0.476 -2.534 2.102 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 119.064 -30.06 – – – 38.77
Bica et al. 2019 119.074 -30.054 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 119.064 -30.06 0.465 -2.529 2.102 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 119.07 -30.062 – 0.241 -1.582 37.9
Kharchenko et al. 2016 119.072 -30.063 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 119.062 -30.063 – -1.48 -1.44 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 119.077 -30.066 – 0.52 -1.84 37.9
Gozha et al. 2012 119.063 -30.063 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 119.064 -30.059 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 119.07 -30.06 – 0.11 – –
van den Bergh 2006 119.075 -30.067 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 119.07 -30.06 – -4.05 -0.97 –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 119.05 -30.06 – -1.92 -1.54 –
Chen et al. 2003 119.054 -30.065 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 119.062 -30.063 – -4.83 5.45 38.2

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 2.25 1.18 1.27 21 0.080 1342 0.61 0.0
Li et al. 2025 2.04 1.20 – 475 0.339 – – –
Wei et al. 2025 2.69 1.14 – 562 0.500 2697 0.63 –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.94 1.53 – 252 – 1087 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 1949(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.97 1.42 – 363 0.390 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.85 1.30 1.27 338 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.78 1.51 – 367 0.051 1136(1) 0.59 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 21 – 76 – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 2.03(1) – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 2.02 1.15 – 18 – – – 0
Dias et al. 2021 1.94 1.53 – 252 0.313 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.28 1.19 – 245 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.02 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 380 -0.250 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 2.02 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.02 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 3.66 1.17 – 21 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.25 2.26 – 21 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.25 2.26 – 21 0.080 – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 3.96 – – 18 0.050 1549 – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 3.70 1.15 – 18 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 3.96 1.15 – 18 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 3.70 1.15 – 18 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 4.00 1.15 – – – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 3.96 1.16 – 10 0.080(1) – – –
Dias et al. 2002 3.96 1.16 – 18 0.080 – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️