Melotte 63

(Collinder 133; NGC 2355; MWSC 1160; OCL 496; FSR 0995; FoF 632)

Click to load Aladin Lite
1.0 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 41.8 [N/pc2]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Melotte 63 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 109.25 13.765 0.523 -3.833 -1.054 35.948
Li et al. 2025 109.247 13.772 0.497 -3.802 -1.086 –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 109.254 13.773 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 109.248 13.771 – – – –
Zhang et al. 2024 109.251 13.762 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 109.251 13.762 0.525 -3.836 -1.054 29.547
Cavallo et al. 2024 109.254 13.773 0.526 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 109.251 13.762 0.525 -3.836 -1.054 29.547
Almeida et al. 2023 109.249 13.768 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 109.239 13.752 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 109.246 13.77 0.527 -3.801 -1.066 –
Rain et al. 2021 109.247 13.772 0.497 -3.802 -1.086 –
Dias et al. 2021 109.248 13.771 0.491 -3.82 -1.073 36.697
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 109.247 13.772 0.497 -3.802 -1.086 –
Donor et al. 2020 109.246 13.75 – -3.38 -1.33 35.5
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 109.247 13.772 0.497 -3.802 -1.086 –
Liu & Pang 2019 109.248 13.774 0.494 -3.812 -1.084 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 109.247 13.772 – – – 36.85
Bica et al. 2019 109.239 13.757 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 109.247 13.772 0.497 -3.802 -1.086 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 109.245 13.751 – -0.452 -2.607 35.1
Kharchenko et al. 2016 109.239 13.752 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 109.246 13.75 – -1.14 -3.35 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 109.246 13.75 – -0.2 -1.2 35.1
Gozha et al. 2012 109.246 13.75 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 109.24 13.75 – 0.06 – –
van den Bergh 2006 109.25 13.783 – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 109.205 13.828 – 0.5 -2.4 35.1
Dias et al. 2002 109.246 13.75 – -2.5 -3.0 35.02

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.9 0.415 0.43 867 -0.075 850 0.51 0.0
Li et al. 2025 1.83 0.46 – 1217 -0.141 – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.150(5) – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.79 0.32 – 1236 – 994 – –
Zhang et al. 2024 – – – – -0.141(1) – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 2022(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.79 0.37 – 1479 0.020 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.73 0.11 0.43 1706 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.78 0.30 – 1242 -0.004 705(1) 0.51 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 794 – 217 – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 1.90(1) – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 1.90 0.68 – 794 – – – 0
Dias et al. 2021 1.79 0.32 – 1236 0.019 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.94 0.59 – 1000 – – – –
Donor et al. 2020 – – – – -0.140 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.90 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 1740 -0.750 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 1.90 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.90 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 2.24 0.48 – 867 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.13 0.58 – 794 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.13 0.58 – 794 -0.070 – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 2.20 – – 708 -0.070 – – –
van den Bergh 2006 2.20 0.37 – 708 – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 2.20 0.37 – 700 -0.070(1) – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.95 0.68 – 794 -0.080 – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸