Melotte 63
(Collinder 133; NGC 2355; MWSC 1160; OCL 496; FSR 0995; FoF 632)
1.0
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
41.8 [N/pc2]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Melotte 63 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 109.25 | 13.765 | 0.523 | -3.833 | -1.054 | 35.948 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 109.247 | 13.772 | 0.497 | -3.802 | -1.086 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 109.254 | 13.773 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 109.248 | 13.771 | â | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 109.251 | 13.762 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 109.251 | 13.762 | 0.525 | -3.836 | -1.054 | 29.547 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 109.254 | 13.773 | 0.526 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 109.251 | 13.762 | 0.525 | -3.836 | -1.054 | 29.547 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 109.249 | 13.768 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 109.239 | 13.752 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 109.246 | 13.77 | 0.527 | -3.801 | -1.066 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 109.247 | 13.772 | 0.497 | -3.802 | -1.086 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 109.248 | 13.771 | 0.491 | -3.82 | -1.073 | 36.697 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 109.247 | 13.772 | 0.497 | -3.802 | -1.086 | â |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | 109.246 | 13.75 | â | -3.38 | -1.33 | 35.5 |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 109.247 | 13.772 | 0.497 | -3.802 | -1.086 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 109.248 | 13.774 | 0.494 | -3.812 | -1.084 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 109.247 | 13.772 | â | â | â | 36.85 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 109.239 | 13.757 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 109.247 | 13.772 | 0.497 | -3.802 | -1.086 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 109.245 | 13.751 | â | -0.452 | -2.607 | 35.1 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 109.239 | 13.752 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 109.246 | 13.75 | â | -1.14 | -3.35 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 109.246 | 13.75 | â | -0.2 | -1.2 | 35.1 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 109.246 | 13.75 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 109.24 | 13.75 | â | 0.06 | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 109.25 | 13.783 | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 109.205 | 13.828 | â | 0.5 | -2.4 | 35.1 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 109.246 | 13.75 | â | -2.5 | -3.0 | 35.02 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.9 | 0.415 | 0.43 | 867 | -0.075 | 850 | 0.51 | 0.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.83 | 0.46 | â | 1217 | -0.141 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.150(5) | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.79 | 0.32 | â | 1236 | â | 994 | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.141(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 2022(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.79 | 0.37 | â | 1479 | 0.020 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.73 | 0.11 | 0.43 | 1706 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.78 | 0.30 | â | 1242 | -0.004 | 705(1) | 0.51 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 794 | â | 217 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 1.90(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 1.90 | 0.68 | â | 794 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.79 | 0.32 | â | 1236 | 0.019 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.94 | 0.59 | â | 1000 | â | â | â | â |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | â | â | â | â | -0.140 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.90 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 1740 | -0.750 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 1.90 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.90 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 2.24 | 0.48 | â | 867 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 2.13 | 0.58 | â | 794 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 2.13 | 0.58 | â | 794 | -0.070 | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 2.20 | â | â | 708 | -0.070 | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 2.20 | 0.37 | â | 708 | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 2.20 | 0.37 | â | 700 | -0.070(1) | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.95 | 0.68 | â | 794 | -0.080 | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.