Melotte 55
(Collinder 120; NGC 2304; MWSC 1019; OCL 484; FSR 0959; FoF 620)
0.96
UTI
0.78
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
21.2 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.78 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Melotte 55 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, well above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 103.802 | 17.985 | 0.235 | -0.001 | -1.457 | 51.208 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 103.802 | 17.984 | 0.219 | -0.024 | -1.514 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 103.8 | 17.986 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 103.803 | 17.985 | â | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 103.803 | 17.985 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 103.803 | 17.985 | 0.239 | 0.002 | -1.466 | 54.079 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 103.8 | 17.986 | 0.241 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 103.803 | 17.985 | 0.239 | 0.002 | -1.466 | 54.079 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 103.791 | 17.982 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 103.816 | 17.978 | 0.264 | -0.036 | -1.501 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 103.802 | 17.984 | 0.219 | -0.024 | -1.514 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 103.803 | 17.985 | 0.215 | -0.023 | -1.538 | 62.074 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 103.802 | 17.984 | 0.219 | -0.024 | -1.514 | â |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | 103.8 | 17.98 | â | -0.12 | -1.52 | 51.5 |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 103.802 | 17.984 | 0.219 | -0.024 | -1.514 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 103.794 | 17.991 | 0.239 | -0.025 | -1.459 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 103.802 | 17.984 | â | â | â | 53.29 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 103.801 | 17.987 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 103.802 | 17.984 | 0.219 | -0.024 | -1.514 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 103.8 | 17.984 | â | -0.382 | -0.69 | 43.4 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 103.791 | 17.982 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 103.804 | 17.983 | â | -1.49 | -6.24 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 103.8 | 17.98 | â | -0.67 | -3.0 | 43.4 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 103.804 | 17.982 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 103.754 | 18.021 | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 103.787 | 17.992 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 103.804 | 17.983 | â | -1.49 | -6.24 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 3.99 | 0.31 | 0.47 | 737 | -0.320 | 698 | â | 0.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 4.31 | 0.37 | â | 847 | -0.128 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.340(5) | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 3.87 | 0.24 | â | 889 | â | 648 | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.181(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 1135(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.90 | 0.46 | â | 1175 | -0.680 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 3.74 | 0.05 | 0.47 | 1242 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 684 | â | 698 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 3.93(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 4.04 | 0.31 | â | 631 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 3.87 | 0.24 | â | 889 | -0.100 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 3.84 | 0.11 | â | 912 | â | â | â | â |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | â | â | â | â | -0.120 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 4.04 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 576 | 0.250 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 4.04 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 4.04 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 4.25 | 0.16 | â | 488 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 3.90 | 0.45 | â | 684 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 3.90 | 0.45 | â | 684 | -0.320 | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 4.40 | â | â | 631 | -0.320 | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 3.99 | 0.31 | â | 794 | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 3.99 | 0.31 | â | 790 | -0.320(1) | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 4.40 | 0.31 | â | 631 | -0.320 | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.