Melotte 48
(Collinder 108; NGC 2259; MWSC 940; OCL 492; FoF 370)
0.90
UTI
0.77
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
56.7 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.77 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Melotte 48 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.
Note: This object shares a small percentage of members with 2 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 99.637 | 10.884 | 0.328 | -0.231 | -1.097 | 64.761 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 99.633 | 10.885 | 0.326 | -0.273 | -1.032 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 99.633 | 10.884 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 99.621 | 10.886 | â | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 99.639 | 10.881 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 99.639 | 10.881 | 0.31 | -0.237 | -1.086 | 80.409 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 99.633 | 10.884 | 0.309 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 99.639 | 10.881 | 0.31 | -0.237 | -1.086 | 80.409 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 99.623 | 10.881 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 99.625 | 10.876 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 99.638 | 10.876 | 0.376 | -0.245 | -1.128 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 99.633 | 10.885 | 0.326 | -0.273 | -1.032 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 99.621 | 10.886 | 0.308 | -0.266 | -1.062 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 99.633 | 10.885 | 0.326 | -0.273 | -1.032 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 99.633 | 10.885 | 0.326 | -0.273 | -1.032 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 99.632 | 10.889 | 0.328 | -0.257 | -1.045 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 99.633 | 10.885 | â | â | â | 65.86 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 99.637 | 10.888 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 99.633 | 10.885 | 0.326 | -0.273 | -1.032 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 99.63 | 10.884 | â | 0.877 | -0.715 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 99.625 | 10.876 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 99.587 | 10.883 | â | 2.79 | -0.96 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 99.633 | 10.875 | â | 2.66 | -2.38 | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 99.588 | 10.883 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 99.643 | 10.89 | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 99.582 | 10.883 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 99.588 | 10.883 | â | 2.79 | -0.96 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 2.82 | 1.83 | 1.18 | 337 | 0.070 | 880 | 0.55 | 4.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 2.63 | 1.64 | â | 742 | -0.152 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.240(5) | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.34 | 1.85 | â | 337 | â | 645 | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | 0.237(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 1114(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.58 | 1.60 | â | 603 | 0.350 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.78 | 1.66 | 1.18 | 350 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 2.62 | 2.00 | â | 316 | -0.160 | 406(1) | 0.55 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 422 | â | 1197 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 2.68(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 2.82 | 1.83 | â | 316 | â | â | â | 4 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.34 | 1.85 | â | 337 | -0.152 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 3.01 | 1.52 | â | 275 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.82 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 603 | 0.500 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.82 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.82 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 2.19 | 1.47 | â | 166 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 3.06 | 2.13 | â | 422 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 3.06 | 2.13 | â | 422 | 0.070 | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 3.31 | â | â | 316 | 0.070 | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 3.31 | 1.83 | â | 316 | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 3.31 | 1.83 | â | 320 | 0.070(1) | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 3.31 | 1.83 | â | 316 | 0.070 | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.