Melotte 210
(Collinder 386; IC 4756; MWSC 2967; Graff 1; OCL 94; FoF 2422; OCSN 207)
1.0
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
37.5 [N/pc2]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Melotte 210 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a moderate percentage of members with 3 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 279.661 | 5.445 | 2.107 | 1.265 | -4.951 | -24.815 |
| Nizovkina et al. | 2025 | 279.627 | 5.437 | â | â | â | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 279.649 | 5.435 | 2.093 | 1.26 | -4.927 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 279.658 | 5.417 | â | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 279.698 | 5.46 | 2.113 | 1.267 | -4.941 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 279.633 | 5.42 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 279.649 | 5.43 | 2.074 | 1.263 | -4.96 | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 279.627 | 5.437 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 279.627 | 5.437 | 2.108 | 1.284 | -4.968 | -24.879 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 279.658 | 5.417 | 2.107 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 279.627 | 5.437 | 2.108 | 1.284 | -4.968 | -24.879 |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 279.67 | 5.43 | 2.1 | 1.27 | -4.97 | -24.96 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 279.728 | 5.449 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 279.66 | 5.435 | 2.109 | 1.278 | -4.95 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 279.634 | 5.477 | 2.097 | 1.233 | -4.954 | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 279.646 | 5.427 | 2.126 | 1.257 | -4.901 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 279.649 | 5.435 | 2.093 | 1.26 | -4.927 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 279.633 | 5.42 | 2.096 | 1.268 | -4.907 | -24.563 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 279.649 | 5.435 | 2.093 | 1.26 | -4.927 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 279.649 | 5.435 | 2.093 | 1.26 | -4.927 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 279.673 | 5.417 | 2.094 | 1.285 | -4.899 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 279.649 | 5.435 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 279.649 | 5.435 | â | â | â | -24.74 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 279.626 | 5.422 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 279.649 | 5.435 | 2.093 | 1.26 | -4.927 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 279.75 | 5.45 | â | -0.14 | -3.4 | -22.4 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 279.728 | 5.449 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 279.75 | 5.45 | â | -0.6 | -1.69 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 279.735 | 5.45 | â | -1.15 | -3.88 | -22.4 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 279.75 | 5.45 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 279.729 | 5.449 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 279.75 | 5.45 | â | 1.0 | â | -22.45 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 279.729 | 5.449 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 279.63 | 5.49 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 279.73 | 5.45 | â | -1.11 | -3.86 | -22.45 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 279.66 | 5.46 | â | -0.42 | -3.03 | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 279.729 | 5.471 | â | 1.06 | -4.32 | -25.8 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 279.75 | 5.45 | â | -0.14 | -3.4 | -25.8 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 0.48 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 632 | -0.010 | 994 | 0.42 | 0.0 |
| Nizovkina et al. | 2025 | 0.45(4) | 0.95(4) | â | 589(4) | -0.170(4) | â | â | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.47 | 0.60 | â | 1076 | -0.048 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.220(5) | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 0.50 | 0.28 | â | 891 | 0.500 | 842 | 0.42 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.47 | 0.63 | â | 975 | â | 705 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.51 | 0.29 | â | 1350 | 0.009 | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | 0.089(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 994(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.47 | 0.89 | â | 646 | -0.010 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.45 | 0.36 | 0.64 | 838 | â | â | â | â |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 0.60 | 0.59 | â | 891 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 617 | â | 269 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.60 | â | 891 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.50 | â | â | 1318 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 0.47(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 0.47 | 0.59 | â | 490 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.47 | 0.63 | â | 975 | 0.006 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.51 | 0.29 | â | 1288 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.47 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 891 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 0.48 | 0.40 | â | 971 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.47 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.47 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.48 | 0.60 | â | 501 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.48 | 0.64 | â | 617 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.48 | 0.64 | â | 617 | -0.150 | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 0.48 | â | â | 500 | -0.150 | 1288 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.48 | 0.59 | â | 617 | â | 2679(1) | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.48 | 0.59 | â | 617 | â | 1250 | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 0.48 | 0.59 | â | 501 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.48 | 0.59 | â | 617 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 0.33 | 0.59 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 0.48 | 0.60 | â | 500 | -0.060(1) | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.48 | 0.60 | â | 500 | -0.010 | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.