Melotte 206
(NGC 6649; MWSC 2949; OCL 66; FoF 293)
1.0
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
N50 (P>50% members)
1189
Stellar density (N50/rad)
155.6 [N/pc2]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Melotte 206 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 278.358 | -10.4 | 0.474 | 0.032 | -0.116 | 7.443 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 278.359 | -10.399 | 0.467 | -0.007 | -0.055 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 278.359 | -10.398 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 278.359 | -10.402 | 0.473 | 0.037 | -0.115 | 26.441 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 278.36 | -10.399 | 0.471 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 278.359 | -10.402 | 0.473 | 0.037 | -0.115 | 26.441 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 278.332 | -10.401 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 278.361 | -10.399 | 0.506 | -0.009 | -0.039 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 278.359 | -10.399 | 0.467 | -0.007 | -0.055 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 278.359 | -10.398 | 0.467 | -0.011 | -0.044 | -8.854 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 278.359 | -10.399 | 0.467 | -0.007 | -0.055 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 278.359 | -10.399 | 0.467 | -0.007 | -0.055 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 278.354 | -10.402 | 0.472 | -0.003 | -0.084 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 278.359 | -10.399 | â | â | â | -8.87 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 278.36 | -10.396 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 278.359 | -10.399 | 0.467 | -0.007 | -0.055 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 278.37 | -10.404 | â | -1.43 | -2.479 | -8.8 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 278.332 | -10.401 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 278.362 | -10.403 | â | -0.46 | 0.07 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 278.34 | -10.4 | â | -1.1 | -2.86 | -8.8 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 278.362 | -10.403 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 278.37 | -10.4 | â | 0.04 | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 278.375 | -10.4 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 278.363 | -10.403 | â | 0.93 | -3.84 | -8.59 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 278.362 | -10.403 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.92 | 3.9 | 1.92 | 42 | 0.053 | 4349 | â | 0.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.78 | 2.88 | â | 2660 | 0.053 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.92 | 3.68 | â | 41 | â | 4349 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 10140(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.07 | 4.55 | â | 43 | 0.560 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.96 | 4.58 | 1.92 | 28 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 126 | â | 76 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 1.98(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 2.02 | 3.72 | â | 36 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.92 | 3.68 | â | 41 | 0.440 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.13 | 3.90 | â | 71 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.02 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 120 | -1.250 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.02 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.02 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.34 | 4.15 | â | 32 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.56 | 4.13 | â | 126 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.56 | 4.13 | â | 126 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.37 | â | â | 37 | 0.050 | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 1.37 | 3.72 | â | 37 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.37 | 3.72 | â | 37 | â | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 1.67 | 4.04 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.