Melotte 156

(Collinder 321; VDBH 207; NGC 6253; MWSC 2502; OCL 972; vdBergh-Hagen 207; ESO 180 02; FSR 1730; FoF 21)

Click to load Aladin Lite
1.0 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 165.3 [N/pc2]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Melotte 156 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 254.781 -52.71 0.582 -4.554 -5.289 -28.391
Li et al. 2025 254.778 -52.712 0.563 -4.537 -5.28 –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 254.785 -52.705 – – – –
Wei et al. 2025 254.783 -52.709 0.586 -4.538 -5.28 –
Carrasco-Varela et al. 2025 255.118 -52.762 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 254.779 -52.71 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 254.771 -52.715 0.584 -4.555 -5.293 -27.693
Cavallo et al. 2024 254.785 -52.705 0.584 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 254.771 -52.715 0.584 -4.555 -5.293 -27.693
Almeida et al. 2023 254.78 -52.707 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 254.759 -52.7 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 254.779 -52.709 0.597 -4.507 -5.287 –
Rain et al. 2021 254.778 -52.712 0.563 -4.537 -5.28 –
Dias et al. 2021 254.779 -52.71 0.559 -4.532 -5.278 -27.932
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 254.778 -52.712 0.563 -4.537 -5.28 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 254.778 -52.712 0.563 -4.537 -5.28 –
Liu & Pang 2019 254.786 -52.705 0.56 -4.516 -5.295 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 254.778 -52.712 – – – -27.97
Bica et al. 2019 254.76 -52.716 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 254.778 -52.712 0.563 -4.537 -5.28 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 254.759 -52.7 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 254.771 -52.708 – -1.13 -4.31 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 254.77 -52.7 – -6.15 -8.51 -29.4
Gozha et al. 2012 254.771 -52.708 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 254.775 -52.717 – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 254.773 -52.722 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 254.771 -52.708 – -1.16 -4.83 -29.6

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.655 0.79 0.35 3626 0.281 2861 0.625 0.14
Li et al. 2025 1.63 0.79 – 3705 0.261 – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.150(5) – – –
Wei et al. 2025 1.78 0.82 – 3548 0.250 4141 0.61 –
Carrasco-Varela et al. 2025 1.67 0.79 – 3540 0.300 – – 0.14(1)
Almeida et al. 2025 1.67 0.79 – 3540 – 1455 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 4476(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.66 0.79 – 3548 0.190 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.65 0.90 0.35 1854 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.59 1.04 – 3350 0.036 2861(1) 0.64 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 5012 – 72 – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 1.67(1) – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 1.69 0.62 – 5012 – – – 14
Dias et al. 2021 1.67 0.79 – 3540 0.301 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.65 0.78 – 3236 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.69 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 3240 0.250 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 1.69 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.69 – – – – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.51 0.62 – 5012 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.51 0.62 – 5012 0.430 – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 1.58 – – 5012 0.430 – – –
van den Bergh 2006 1.51 0.62 – 5012 – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 1.51 0.62 – 5000 0.360(1) – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.51 0.62 – 5012 0.445 – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸