Melotte 130

(Collinder 289; Loden 2104; VDBH 168; NGC 5822; MWSC 2269; OCL 937; vdBergh-Hagen 168; ESO 176 09; FoF 2241)

Click to load Aladin Lite
1.0 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 39.8 [N/pc2]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Melotte 130 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 226.047 -54.383 1.2 -7.477 -5.494 -28.6
Nizovkina et al. 2025 226.07 -54.357 – – – –
Li et al. 2025 226.051 -54.366 1.187 -7.422 -5.534 –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 226.061 -54.383 – – – –
Wei et al. 2025 226.047 -54.375 1.202 -7.481 -5.486 –
Almeida et al. 2025 226.085 -54.365 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 226.052 -54.366 1.163 -7.473 -5.488 –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 226.07 -54.356 1.2 -7.462 -5.479 -28.998
Cavallo et al. 2024 226.061 -54.384 1.201 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 226.07 -54.356 1.2 -7.462 -5.479 -28.998
Cordoni et al. 2023 226.085 -54.365 1.188 -7.417 -5.534 –
Just et al. 2023 226.106 -54.388 – – – –
He et al. 2022 226.033 -54.387 1.201 -7.478 -5.48 –
Tarricq et al. 2022 225.887 -54.344 1.197 -7.484 -5.495 –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 226.035 -54.365 1.217 -7.442 -5.547 –
Rain et al. 2021 226.051 -54.366 1.187 -7.422 -5.534 –
Dias et al. 2021 226.085 -54.365 1.188 -7.417 -5.534 -27.686
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 226.051 -54.366 1.187 -7.422 -5.534 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 226.051 -54.366 1.187 -7.422 -5.534 –
Liu & Pang 2019 226.03 -54.384 1.184 -7.417 -5.524 –
Bossini et al. 2019 226.051 -54.366 – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 226.051 -54.366 – – – -28.15
Bica et al. 2019 226.181 -54.358 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 226.051 -54.366 1.187 -7.422 -5.534 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 226.095 -54.397 – -6.86 -3.53 -21.2
Kharchenko et al. 2016 226.106 -54.388 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 226.088 -54.397 – -6.86 -3.53 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 226.117 -54.39 – -7.38 -5.17 -21.2
Gozha et al. 2012 226.087 -54.397 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 226.085 -54.401 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 226.09 -54.4 – 0.53 – -21.17
Piskunov et al. 2007 226.085 -54.401 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 226.1 -54.4 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 226.09 -54.4 – -7.46 -5.66 -24.42
Kharchenko et al. 2003 226.03 -54.33 – -8.23 -6.4 –
Chen et al. 2003 226.275 -54.333 – -8.34 -2.65 -29.7
Dias et al. 2002 226.088 -54.397 – -6.86 -3.53 -29.31

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 0.82 0.46 0.24 891 -0.007 1413 0.385 0.0
Nizovkina et al. 2025 0.80(4) 0.48(4) – 1114(4) -0.174(4) – – –
Li et al. 2025 0.80 0.57 – 1070 -0.141 – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.290(5) – – –
Wei et al. 2025 0.97 0.61 – 933 0.000 1916 0.46 –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.80 0.48 – 1094 – 1270 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.85 0.39 – 1020 -0.015 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 1556(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.80 0.53 – 1096 0.160 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.78 0.20 0.24 1040 – – – –
Cordoni et al. 2023 0.80 0.48 – 1094 -0.015 1144 0.31 0.00
Just et al. 2023 – – – 692 – 359 – –
He et al. 2022 – 0.55 – 891 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 0.84 – – 955 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 0.82(1) – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 0.82 0.31 – 891 – – – 1
Dias et al. 2021 0.80 0.48 – 1094 -0.015 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.86 0.39 – 912 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.82 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 933 0.500 – – –
Bossini et al. 2019 0.81 0.35 – 891 0.080 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 0.82 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 0.82 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 0.92 0.47 – 650 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 0.79 0.97 – 692 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 0.79 0.97 – 692 0.050 – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 0.92 – – 662 0.050 1778 – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 0.92 0.46 – 676 – 3304(1) – –
Piskunov et al. 2007 0.92 0.46 – 676 – 1197 – –
van den Bergh 2006 0.92 0.46 – 661 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 0.92 0.46 – 676 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 0.92 0.46 – – – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 0.92 0.46 – 660 -0.020(1) – – –
Dias et al. 2002 0.93 0.32 – 891 0.050 – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Cluster % RA DEC Plx pmRA pmDE Rv UTI
CWWDL 14493 3.3 225.48 -54.3 1.21 -7.63 -5.38 -31.44 0.0

💡 Note: The % column shows the percentage of members that Melotte 130 shares with each listed object.

Visualization

â„šī¸