Melotte 104

(Collinder 245; VDBH116; IC 2714; FSR 1582; MWSC 1930; OCL 855; vdBergh-Hagen 116; ESO 129 18; MWSC 1929; FoF 819)

Click to load Aladin Lite
1.0 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 8.6 [arcmin]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
Melotte 104 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close Moderate extinction Massive Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 169.377 -62.714 0.739 -7.588 2.679 -13.471
Nizovkina et al. 2025 169.369 -62.734 – – – –
Li et al. 2025 169.373 -62.719 0.719 -7.597 2.639 –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 169.391 -62.715 – – – –
Wei et al. 2025 169.373 -62.715 0.745 -7.589 2.682 –
Almeida et al. 2025 169.379 -62.711 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 169.369 -62.734 0.741 -7.595 2.692 -15.401
Cavallo et al. 2024 169.391 -62.715 0.742 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 169.369 -62.734 0.741 -7.595 2.692 -15.401
Cordoni et al. 2023 169.379 -62.711 0.723 -7.588 2.66 –
Just et al. 2023 169.357 -62.737 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 169.34 -62.724 0.734 -7.585 2.682 –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 169.374 -62.731 0.747 -7.599 2.628 –
Rain et al. 2021 169.373 -62.719 0.719 -7.597 2.639 –
Dias et al. 2021 169.379 -62.711 0.723 -7.588 2.66 -13.184
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 169.373 -62.719 0.719 -7.597 2.639 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 169.363 -62.733 – -7.651 2.617 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 169.373 -62.719 0.719 -7.597 2.639 –
Liu & Pang 2019 169.365 -62.719 0.721 -7.58 2.649 –
Bossini et al. 2019 169.373 -62.719 – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 169.373 -62.719 – – – -12.93
Bica et al. 2019 169.345 -62.721 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 169.373 -62.719 0.719 -7.597 2.639 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 169.365 -62.732 – -6.847 5.407 -14.1
Kharchenko et al. 2016 169.357 -62.737 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 169.363 -62.733 – -3.74 0.12 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 169.365 -62.74 – -8.0 1.5 -14.1
Gozha et al. 2012 169.363 -62.733 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 169.365 -62.724 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 169.36 -62.73 – 0.17 – –
Froebrich et al. 2007 169.296 -62.742 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 169.375 -62.733 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 169.36 -62.73 – -7.38 0.45 –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 169.35 -62.72 – -2.56 -3.4 –
Chen et al. 2003 169.365 -62.724 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 169.363 -62.733 – -3.74 0.12 -14.1

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Nizovkina et al. 2025 1.15* 1.18* – 476* -0.254* – – –
Li et al. 2025 1.32 1.09 – 476 0.155 – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.190* – – –
Wei et al. 2025 2.30 1.36 – 355 0.250 1857 0.42 –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.23 1.22 – 476 – 2996 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 3885* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.27 1.07 – 646 0.220 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.27 0.95 0.53 433 – – – –
Cordoni et al. 2023 1.23 1.22 – 476 0.040 8795 0.40 0.00
Just et al. 2023 – – – 447 – 90 – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 1.32 – – 537 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 1.34* – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 1.34 0.96 – 355 – – – 0
Dias et al. 2021 1.23 1.22 – 476 0.040 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.36 0.95 – 525 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.34 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 112 0.250 – – –
Bossini et al. 2019 1.39 0.99 – 355 0.020 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 1.34 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.34 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 1.25 1.05 – 356 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.22 1.29 – 447 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.22 1.29 – 447 0.010 – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 1.24 – – 348 0.010 174 – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 1.24 1.05 – 257 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 1.24 1.05 – 347 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 1.24 1.05 – 257 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 1.24 1.05 – – – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 1.24 1.06 – 340 -0.010* – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.24 1.06 – 348 0.010 – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️