Melotte 102

(Collinder 229; VDBH 103; IC 2602; MWSC 1841; OCL 838; vdBergh-Hagen 103; ESO 093 02; OCSN 205)

Click to load Aladin Lite
1.0 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 31.2 [N/pc2]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Melotte 102 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 160.605 -64.341 6.602 -17.804 10.497 16.424
Li et al. 2025 160.613 -64.426 6.561 -17.582 10.7 –
Almeida et al. 2025 160.418 -64.417 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 160.939 -64.402 6.575 -17.862 10.552 –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 160.973 -64.393 6.6 -17.775 10.669 15.935
Cavallo et al. 2024 160.896 -64.495 6.599 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 160.973 -64.393 6.6 -17.775 10.669 15.935
Almeida et al. 2023 160.603 -64.344 – – – –
Qin et al. 2023 160.77 -64.37 6.59 -17.76 10.61 16.96
He et al. 2022 160.786 -64.455 6.611 -17.763 10.62 –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 160.472 -64.468 6.604 -17.597 10.774 –
Rain et al. 2021 160.613 -64.426 6.561 -17.582 10.7 –
Dias et al. 2021 160.418 -64.417 6.552 -17.638 10.68 16.806
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 160.613 -64.426 6.561 -17.582 10.7 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 160.613 -64.426 6.561 -17.582 10.7 –
Bossini et al. 2019 160.613 -64.426 – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 160.613 -64.426 – – – 17.44
Bica et al. 2019 160.788 -64.381 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 160.613 -64.426 6.561 -17.582 10.7 –
Yen et al. 2018 160.617 -64.244 6.79 -17.63 10.57 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 160.74 -64.4 – -17.49 10.1 21.9
Kharchenko et al. 2016 160.434 -64.396 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 160.742 -64.4 – -4.34 1.4 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 160.44 -64.4 – -16.95 9.65 21.9
Gozha et al. 2012 160.742 -64.4 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 160.58 -64.401 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 160.74 -64.4 – 2.5 – 19.02
Piskunov et al. 2007 160.58 -64.401 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 160.8 -64.4 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 160.59 -64.4 – -17.16 11.11 19.01
Kharchenko et al. 2003 160.59 -64.4 – -17.8 11.2 –
Chen et al. 2003 160.746 -64.394 – -17.49 10.1 22.0
Dias et al. 2002 160.742 -64.4 – -17.49 10.1 18.12
Dambis 1999 160.742 -64.4 – – – –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 0.15 0.09 0.56 36 0.000 470 0.32 0.0
Li et al. 2025 0.15 0.14 – 54 0.037 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.15 0.29 – 47 – 192 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.15 0.03 – 33 -0.015 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 237(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.15 0.65 – 33 0.080 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.15 0.11 0.56 26 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 0.15 0.10 – 50 0.121 264(1) 0.32 –
Qin et al. 2023 0.16 0.19 – 28 – – – –
He et al. 2022 – 0.05 – 32 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 0.15(1) – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 0.15 0.06 – 32 – – – 0
Dias et al. 2021 0.15 0.29 – 47 -0.016 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.15 0.03 – 36 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.15 – – – – – – –
Bossini et al. 2019 0.15 0.10 – 35 0.000 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 0.15 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 0.15 – – – – – – –
Yen et al. 2018 0.15 0.01 – 100 – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 0.16 0.07 – 32 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 0.15 0.10 – 221 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 0.15 0.10 – 221 -0.099 – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 0.16 – – 32 0.000 676 – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 0.16 0.09 – 68 – 1012(1) – –
Piskunov et al. 2007 0.16 0.09 – 68 – 767 – –
van den Bergh 2006 0.16 0.06 – 32 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 0.16 0.09 – 68 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 0.15 0.06 – – – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 0.16 0.07 – 30 -0.090(1) – – –
Dias et al. 2002 0.16 0.07 – 32 0.000 – – –
Dambis 1999 0.14 0.12 – 40 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸