Lynga 6

(MWSC 2348)

0.98 UTI

0.88

C_N

1.0

C_dens

1.0

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N₅₀ (P>50% members) 438

Stellar density (N₅₀/rad) 25.9 [N/pc²]

C3 classification AA

C_N 0.88 Rich
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 1.0 Very high quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Lynga 6 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate^* distance, near the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a very metal-rich, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~2.67 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~2.04 kpc).

Relatively close High extinction Very metal-rich Young

Palma et al. (2025)
Part of multiple system G164, along with HSC_2748 and OC_0644.

Morales et al. (2013)
Classified as morphological type 'OC2' (totally exposed cluster without correlation with ATLASGAL emission). Morphological flag: one or a few submm emission within the cluster area.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Silver sample.

Data

🔍 Search references for Lynga 6 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	241.213	-51.959	0.375	-1.896	-2.747	-46.442
Hunt & Reffert	2024	241.221	-51.965	0.376	-1.909	-2.747	-33.494
Celli et al.	2024	241.218	-51.96	–	–	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	241.197	-51.965	0.377	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	241.221	-51.965	0.376	-1.909	-2.747	-33.494
Just et al.	2023	241.212	-51.924	–	–	–	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	241.198	-51.96	0.4	-1.867	-2.732	–
Rain et al.	2021	241.218	-51.96	0.383	-1.866	-2.757	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	241.218	-51.96	0.383	-1.866	-2.757	–
Sánchez et al.	2020	241.217	-51.933	–	-1.836	-2.78	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	241.218	-51.96	0.383	-1.866	-2.757	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	241.218	-51.96	–	–	–	-46.6
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	241.218	-51.96	0.383	-1.866	-2.757	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	241.215	-51.934	–	-1.088	-3.541	-59.4
Kharchenko et al.	2016	241.212	-51.924	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	241.217	-51.933	–	-2.61	-4.01	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	241.222	-51.925	–	-4.08	-1.17	-59.4
Morales et al.	2013	241.217	-51.933	–	–	–	–
Gozha et al.	2012	241.217	-51.933	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2007	241.21	-51.93	–	0.04	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	241.2	-51.917	–	–	–	–
Chen et al.	2003	241.279	-51.93	–	-13.61	-1.83	-59.4
Dias et al.	2002	241.217	-51.933	–	-13.61	-1.83	-59.4
Dambis	1999	241.217	-51.933	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	2.04	3.88	2.83	27	1.060	454	–	0.0
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	3856⁽¹⁾	–	–
Celli et al.	2024	–	–	–	3	–	454	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	2.86	3.86	–	26	1.060	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	2.45	4.24	2.83	31	–	–	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	28	–	139	–	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	2.52⁽¹⁾	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Rain et al.	2021	2.43	3.88	–	27	–	–	–	0
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	2.42	3.51	–	3	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	2.43	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	2.43	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	2.43	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	1.60	3.82	–	31	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	1.77	3.94	–	28	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	1.77	3.94	–	28	–	–	–	–
Morales et al.	2013	1.79	–	–	35	–	–	–	–
Gozha et al.	2012	1.60	–	–	27	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	1.60	3.88	–	27	–	–	–	–
Chen et al.	2003	1.60	–	–	20	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	1.60	3.88	–	27	–	–	–	–
Dambis	1999	2.04	4.20	–	45	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3