Lynga 5

(MWSC 2310)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.85 UTI
0.83
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.71
Clit
1.0
Cdup
N50 (P>50% members) 315
Stellar density (N50/rad) 37.2 [N/pc2]
C3 classification AA
  • CN 0.83 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 0.71 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique
πŸ“₯ Members πŸ“Š Colab πŸ”¬ Bayestar19 MOCAMOCA πŸ” CDS πŸ” Simbad πŸ” CDS (Ξ±, Ξ΄) πŸ” Simbad (Ξ±, Ξ΄)

Overview
ℹ️
Lynga 5 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.28 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.28 (50th percentile).

Morales et al. (2013)
Classified as morphological type 'OC2' (totally exposed cluster without correlation with ATLASGAL emission). Morphological flag: exposed cluster, without submm emission.

Data
πŸ” Search references for Lynga 5 in: SciX Simbad
ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 235.457 -56.675 0.33 -3.671 -3.583 -67.581
Almeida et al. 2025 235.474 -56.687 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 235.46 -56.669 0.337 -3.665 -3.594 -56.467
Cavallo et al. 2024 235.466 -56.679 0.339 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 235.46 -56.669 0.337 -3.665 -3.594 -56.467
Just et al. 2023 235.463 -56.649 – – – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 235.462 -56.68 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 235.474 -56.687 0.302 -3.666 -3.552 -71.981
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 235.462 -56.68 0.305 -3.66 -3.561 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 235.475 -56.65 – -3.652 -3.513 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 235.462 -56.68 0.305 -3.66 -3.561 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 235.462 -56.68 – – – -68.12
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 235.462 -56.68 0.305 -3.66 -3.561 –
Dias et al. 2018 – – – -3.7 -3.54 –
Dib et al. 2018 235.474 -56.65 – – – –
Sampedro et al. 2017 235.475 -56.65 -1.38 -2.32 – –
Joshi et al. 2016 235.474 -56.65 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 235.463 -56.649 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 235.475 -56.65 – -1.25 -2.74 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 235.474 -56.65 – -5.7 -3.58 –
Morales et al. 2013 235.475 -56.65 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 235.475 -56.65 – -1.25 -2.74 –
Lynga 1987 235.515 -56.629 – – – –
van den Bergh & Hagen 1975 234.6 -56.567 – – – –

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 2.595 2.76 2.32 794 0.251 1611 – 0
Almeida et al. 2025 2.48 3.45 – 62 – 1266 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 5753(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 3.47 4.40 – 74 0.130 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.71 4.25 2.32 147 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 944 – 351 – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 2.92 2.50 – 794 – 1956 – 0(1)
Dias et al. 2021 2.48 3.45 – 62 0.372 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.92 2.50 – 794 – – – –
Kounkel et al. 2020 2.89 3.62 – 347 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.99 – – – – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 2.99 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.99 – – – – – – –
Dib et al. 2018 1.75 – – 944 – – – –
Joshi et al. 2016 1.75 2.76 – 944 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.75 2.76 – 944 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.75 2.76 – 944 – – – –
Morales et al. 2013 1.95 – – 50 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.75 2.76 – 944 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization
ℹ️
Lynga 5 UCC
Lynga 5 HUNT23
Lynga 5 CANTAT20
Galactocentric position diagram