Lynga 3
(MWSC 2284)
0.74
UTI
0.47
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.75
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
1.3 [arcmin]
- CN 0.47 Poorly populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.75 Well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Lynga 3 is a poorly populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large distance, below the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Very distant
High extinction
Massive
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 229.192 | -58.374 | 0.148 | -4.887 | -3.794 | -4.871 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 229.193 | -58.365 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 229.197 | -58.375 | 0.161 | -4.914 | -3.809 | -4.838 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 229.199 | -58.373 | 0.163 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 229.197 | -58.375 | 0.161 | -4.914 | -3.809 | -4.838 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 229.195 | -58.339 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 229.193 | -58.365 | 0.117 | -4.858 | -3.756 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 229.194 | -58.373 | 0.108 | -4.853 | -3.727 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 229.194 | -58.373 | 0.108 | -4.853 | -3.727 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 229.194 | -58.373 | 0.108 | -4.853 | -3.727 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 229.195 | -58.339 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 229.204 | -58.367 | â | -10.04 | -3.89 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 229.207 | -58.34 | â | -2.39 | 0.01 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 229.204 | -58.367 | â | -10.04 | -3.89 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 6.92 | 4.69 | â | 5 | â | 1949 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 3768* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 4.85 | 5.79 | â | 2 | -0.170 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 5.75 | 6.26 | 2.26 | 7 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 822 | â | 2636 | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 6.92 | 4.69 | â | 5 | 0.067 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 7.29 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 7.29 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 4.16 | 4.84 | â | 822 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 4.16 | 4.84 | â | 822 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 4.16 | 4.84 | â | 822 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Silver sample.