Loden 46
(MWSC 1798)
0.79
UTI
0.34
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.62
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
7.9 [arcmin]
- CN 0.34 Poorly populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.62 Intermediate quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Loden 46 is a poorly populated, very dense object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 155.918 | -54.691 | 0.891 | -11.401 | 4.682 | 27.118 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 155.884 | -54.667 | 0.875 | -11.367 | 4.645 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 155.825 | -54.62 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 155.815 | -54.631 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 155.878 | -54.677 | 0.88 | -11.417 | 4.7 | 24.894 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 155.824 | -54.62 | 0.885 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 155.878 | -54.677 | 0.88 | -11.417 | 4.7 | 24.894 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 155.95 | -54.619 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 155.792 | -54.837 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 155.885 | -54.67 | 0.894 | -11.406 | 4.73 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 155.815 | -54.631 | 0.875 | -11.366 | 4.636 | 26.659 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 155.884 | -54.667 | 0.875 | -11.367 | 4.645 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 155.884 | -54.667 | 0.875 | -11.367 | 4.645 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 155.884 | -54.667 | â | â | â | 24.32 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 155.9 | -54.728 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 155.884 | -54.667 | 0.875 | -11.367 | 4.645 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 155.745 | -54.8 | â | -5.6 | -0.7 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 155.792 | -54.837 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 155.75 | -54.8 | â | -5.6 | -0.7 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 155.797 | -54.84 | â | -6.55 | 1.8 | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 155.779 | -54.838 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 155.779 | -54.838 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 155.79 | -54.84 | â | -14.11 | 2.98 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.28 | 0.50 | â | 684 | 0.140 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.220* | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.07 | 0.61 | â | 697 | â | 84 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 91* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.05 | 0.26 | â | 832 | 0.280 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.06 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 662 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.09 | 0.48 | â | 822 | -0.119 | 288* | 0.67 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 100 | â | 45 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.55 | â | 708 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 1.08 | â | â | 832 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.07 | 0.61 | â | 697 | -0.038 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.11 | 0.21 | â | 832 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.11 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 1.11 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.11 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.53 | 0.43 | â | 1072 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.18 | 1.29 | â | 100 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.18 | 1.29 | â | 100 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.54 | 0.43 | â | 1072 | â | 243* | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.54 | 0.43 | â | 1072 | â | 73 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.54 | 0.43 | â | 1072 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: worst fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.