Loden 46

(MWSC 1798)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.79 UTI
0.34
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.62
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 7.9 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.34 Poorly populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.62 Intermediate quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Loden 46 is a poorly populated, very dense object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: worst fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 155.918 -54.691 0.891 -11.401 4.682 27.118
Li et al. 2025 155.884 -54.667 0.875 -11.367 4.645 –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 155.825 -54.62 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 155.815 -54.631 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 155.878 -54.677 0.88 -11.417 4.7 24.894
Cavallo et al. 2024 155.824 -54.62 0.885 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 155.878 -54.677 0.88 -11.417 4.7 24.894
Almeida et al. 2023 155.95 -54.619 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 155.792 -54.837 – – – –
He et al. 2022 155.885 -54.67 0.894 -11.406 4.73 –
Dias et al. 2021 155.815 -54.631 0.875 -11.366 4.636 26.659
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 155.884 -54.667 0.875 -11.367 4.645 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 155.884 -54.667 0.875 -11.367 4.645 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 155.884 -54.667 – – – 24.32
Bica et al. 2019 155.9 -54.728 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 155.884 -54.667 0.875 -11.367 4.645 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 155.745 -54.8 – -5.6 -0.7 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 155.792 -54.837 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 155.75 -54.8 – -5.6 -0.7 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 155.797 -54.84 – -6.55 1.8 –
Piskunov et al. 2008 155.779 -54.838 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2007 155.779 -54.838 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 155.79 -54.84 – -14.11 2.98 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 1.28 0.50 – 684 0.140 – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.220* – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.07 0.61 – 697 – 84 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 91* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.05 0.26 – 832 0.280 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.06 0.17 0.22 662 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.09 0.48 – 822 -0.119 288* 0.67 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 100 – 45 – –
He et al. 2022 – 0.55 – 708 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 1.08 – – 832 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 1.07 0.61 – 697 -0.038 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.11 0.21 – 832 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.11 – – – – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 1.11 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.11 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 0.53 0.43 – 1072 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.18 1.29 – 100 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.18 1.29 – 100 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 0.54 0.43 – 1072 – 243* – –
Piskunov et al. 2007 0.54 0.43 – 1072 – 73 – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 0.54 0.43 – 1072 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸