Koposov 43
(FSR 0828; MWSC 687; MWSC 688)
0.90
UTI
0.75
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
2.4 [arcmin]
- CN 0.75 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Koposov 43 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Distant
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Old
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 88.081 | 29.901 | 0.191 | -0.078 | -1.671 | 12.029 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 88.079 | 29.901 | 0.18 | -0.037 | -1.664 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 88.067 | 29.906 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 88.103 | 29.89 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 88.091 | 29.912 | 0.204 | -0.082 | -1.662 | 12.695 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 88.067 | 29.906 | 0.201 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 88.091 | 29.912 | 0.204 | -0.082 | -1.662 | 12.695 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 88.09 | 29.891 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 88.064 | 29.898 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 88.103 | 29.89 | 0.185 | -0.026 | -1.664 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 88.079 | 29.901 | 0.18 | -0.037 | -1.664 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 88.079 | 29.901 | 0.18 | -0.037 | -1.664 | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 88.061 | 29.919 | â | -0.05 | -1.665 | 2.41 |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 88.079 | 29.901 | â | â | â | -2.87 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 88.058 | 29.918 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 88.079 | 29.901 | 0.18 | -0.037 | -1.664 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 88.065 | 29.919 | â | -0.094 | -1.196 | 26.6 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 88.064 | 29.898 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 88.062 | 29.919 | â | 1.07 | -3.35 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 88.072 | 29.897 | â | 0.53 | -5.24 | 26.6 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 88.072 | 29.897 | â | 0.53 | -5.24 | â |
| Glushkova et al. | 2010 | 88.061 | 29.919 | â | â | â | â |
| Koposov et al. | 2008 | 88.061 | 29.919 | â | â | â | â |
| Froebrich et al. | 2007 | 88.075 | 29.904 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 88.062 | 29.919 | â | 1.07 | -3.35 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 4.67 | 2.00 | â | 1190 | -0.332 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.390* | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 4.83 | 2.06 | â | 1000 | â | 112 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 1095* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 4.21 | 1.44 | â | 2138 | -0.170 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 3.91 | 1.50 | 1.73 | 948 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 4.66 | 2.05 | â | 1096 | -0.307 | 948* | 0.76 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 1303 | â | 467 | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 4.83 | 2.06 | â | 1000 | -0.309 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 4.66 | 1.41 | â | 2818 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 4.79 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 6.19 | 1.61 | â | 1156 | 0.032 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 4.79 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 4.79 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 4.26 | 2.19 | â | 63 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 3.00 | 2.02 | â | 1303 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 3.00 | 2.02 | â | 1303 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 3.00 | 2.02 | â | 1303 | â | â | â | â |
| Glushkova et al. | 2010 | 2.80 | 1.18 | â | 1995 | â | â | â | â |
| Koposov et al. | 2008 | 2.80 | 1.18 | â | 1995 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 2.80 | 1.18 | â | 1995 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.