Koposov 10

(FSR 0795; MWSC 669; MWSC 668)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.88 UTI
0.64
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 2.3 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.64 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Koposov 10 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate* distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~3.06 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~2.32 kpc).

Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 86.864 35.427 0.327 0.491 -1.729 –
Almeida et al. 2025 86.861 35.429 – – – –
Zhang et al. 2024 86.865 35.421 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 86.865 35.421 0.321 0.486 -1.711 –
Cavallo et al. 2024 86.871 35.429 0.322 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 86.865 35.421 0.321 0.486 -1.711 –
Almeida et al. 2023 86.859 35.431 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 86.865 35.42 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 86.861 35.429 0.309 0.47 -1.826 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 86.861 35.427 0.329 0.457 -1.78 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 86.861 35.427 0.329 0.457 -1.78 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 86.861 35.427 – – – 0.0
Bica et al. 2019 86.88 35.431 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 86.861 35.427 0.329 0.457 -1.78 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 86.865 35.432 – 1.237 -1.371 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 86.865 35.42 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 86.871 35.432 – 0.25 -3.02 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 86.875 35.419 – 4.47 -4.56 –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 86.875 35.419 – 4.46 -4.71 –
Glushkova et al. 2010 86.869 35.432 – – – –
Koposov et al. 2008 86.869 35.432 – – – –
Froebrich et al. 2007 86.871 35.432 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 86.871 35.432 – 0.25 -3.02 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Almeida et al. 2025 2.26 2.46 – 251 – 462 – –
Zhang et al. 2024 – – – – -0.124* – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 512* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.65 2.57 – 126 0.290 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.73 2.65 1.00 62 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 2.38 2.50 – 190 -0.192 457* 0.65 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 596 – 9 – –
Dias et al. 2021 2.26 2.46 – 251 -0.211 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.99 2.08 – 178 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.79 – – – – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 2.79 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.79 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 3.16 2.00 – 417 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.82 1.94 – 596 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.82 1.94 – 596 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 1.70 2.02 – 692 – – – –
Glushkova et al. 2010 2.00 2.51 – 398 – – – –
Koposov et al. 2008 2.00 2.51 – 398 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 2.00 2.51 – 398 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸