Koposov 10
(FSR 0795; MWSC 669; MWSC 668)
0.88
UTI
0.64
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
2.3 [arcmin]
- CN 0.64 Moderately populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Koposov 10 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate* distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
(*): The parallax distance estimate (~3.06 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~2.32 kpc).
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 86.864 | 35.427 | 0.327 | 0.491 | -1.729 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 86.861 | 35.429 | â | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 86.865 | 35.421 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 86.865 | 35.421 | 0.321 | 0.486 | -1.711 | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 86.871 | 35.429 | 0.322 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 86.865 | 35.421 | 0.321 | 0.486 | -1.711 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 86.859 | 35.431 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 86.865 | 35.42 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 86.861 | 35.429 | 0.309 | 0.47 | -1.826 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 86.861 | 35.427 | 0.329 | 0.457 | -1.78 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 86.861 | 35.427 | 0.329 | 0.457 | -1.78 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 86.861 | 35.427 | â | â | â | 0.0 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 86.88 | 35.431 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 86.861 | 35.427 | 0.329 | 0.457 | -1.78 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 86.865 | 35.432 | â | 1.237 | -1.371 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 86.865 | 35.42 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 86.871 | 35.432 | â | 0.25 | -3.02 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 86.875 | 35.419 | â | 4.47 | -4.56 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 86.875 | 35.419 | â | 4.46 | -4.71 | â |
| Glushkova et al. | 2010 | 86.869 | 35.432 | â | â | â | â |
| Koposov et al. | 2008 | 86.869 | 35.432 | â | â | â | â |
| Froebrich et al. | 2007 | 86.871 | 35.432 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 86.871 | 35.432 | â | 0.25 | -3.02 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.26 | 2.46 | â | 251 | â | 462 | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.124* | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 512* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.65 | 2.57 | â | 126 | 0.290 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.73 | 2.65 | 1.00 | 62 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 2.38 | 2.50 | â | 190 | -0.192 | 457* | 0.65 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 596 | â | 9 | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.26 | 2.46 | â | 251 | -0.211 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.99 | 2.08 | â | 178 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.79 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.79 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.79 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 3.16 | 2.00 | â | 417 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.82 | 1.94 | â | 596 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.82 | 1.94 | â | 596 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 1.70 | 2.02 | â | 692 | â | â | â | â |
| Glushkova et al. | 2010 | 2.00 | 2.51 | â | 398 | â | â | â | â |
| Koposov et al. | 2008 | 2.00 | 2.51 | â | 398 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 2.00 | 2.51 | â | 398 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.