King 20
(MWSC 3739; OCL 262; FSR 0434; FoF 2071)
0.91
UTI
0.78
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
4.1 [arcmin]
- CN 0.78 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
King 20 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | β | 353.317 | 58.476 | 0.506 | -2.677 | -2.646 | -31.587 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 353.305 | 58.469 | 0.496 | -2.686 | -2.585 | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 353.305 | 58.473 | β | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 353.305 | 58.467 | 0.499 | -2.668 | -2.647 | β |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 353.305 | 58.468 | 0.504 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 353.305 | 58.467 | 0.499 | -2.668 | -2.647 | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 353.322 | 58.472 | β | β | β | β |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 353.318 | 58.459 | β | β | β | β |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 353.305 | 58.469 | 0.496 | -2.686 | -2.585 | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 353.305 | 58.473 | 0.501 | -2.679 | -2.592 | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 353.305 | 58.469 | 0.496 | -2.686 | -2.585 | β |
| SΓ‘nchez et al. | 2020 | 353.312 | 58.467 | β | -2.693 | -2.584 | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 353.305 | 58.469 | 0.496 | -2.686 | -2.585 | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 353.311 | 58.475 | 0.498 | -2.698 | -2.575 | β |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 353.305 | 58.469 | β | β | β | β |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 353.307 | 58.471 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 353.305 | 58.469 | 0.496 | -2.686 | -2.585 | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 353.31 | 58.467 | β | -1.188 | 3.654 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 353.318 | 58.459 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 353.312 | 58.467 | β | -1.24 | -0.15 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 353.325 | 58.463 | β | -1.73 | 5.32 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 353.325 | 58.463 | β | -1.73 | 5.32 | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 353.312 | 58.467 | β | -1.24 | -0.15 | β |
π‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.54 | 2.51 | β | 162 | 0.053 | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.66 | 2.51 | β | 54 | β | 394 | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | β | β | β | β | β | 855* | β | β |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.05 | 2.63 | β | 117 | 0.540 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.84 | 2.53 | 1.00 | 73 | β | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.71 | 2.59 | β | 42 | 0.113 | 471* | 0.54 | β |
| Just et al. | 2023 | β | β | β | 445 | β | 100 | β | β |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 1.90 | 2.02 | β | 200 | β | β | β | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.66 | 2.51 | β | 54 | 0.157 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.95 | 2.06 | β | 257 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.90 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | β | β | β | 6 | 0.500 | β | β | β |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 1.98 | 2.07 | β | 349 | 0.000 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.90 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.48 | 1.74 | β | 209 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.85 | 2.17 | β | 445 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.85 | 2.17 | β | 445 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 1.85 | 2.17 | β | 445 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.90 | 2.02 | β | 200 | β | β | β | β |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.