King 11

(MWSC 3759; OCL 279; FSR 0467; FoF 609)

Click to load Aladin Lite
1.0 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 3.7 [arcmin]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
King 11 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a very massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.

Relatively close High extinction Very massive Near-solar metallicity Old Contains BSS

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Silver sample.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 356.908 68.635 0.306 -3.381 -0.671 -24.484
Li et al. 2025 356.912 68.636 0.262 -3.358 -0.643 –
Almeida et al. 2025 356.92 68.635 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 356.91 68.636 0.306 -3.38 -0.667 -25.639
Cavallo et al. 2024 356.902 68.635 0.301 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 356.91 68.636 0.306 -3.38 -0.667 -25.639
Just et al. 2023 356.93 68.645 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 356.897 68.636 0.285 -3.364 -0.661 –
Rain et al. 2021 356.912 68.636 0.262 -3.358 -0.643 –
Dias et al. 2021 356.92 68.635 0.267 -3.401 -0.626 -34.755
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 356.912 68.636 0.262 -3.358 -0.643 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 356.95 68.633 – -3.492 -0.545 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 356.912 68.636 0.262 -3.358 -0.643 –
Liu & Pang 2019 356.921 68.638 0.299 -3.34 -0.602 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 356.912 68.636 – – – -24.61
Bica et al. 2019 356.906 68.642 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 356.912 68.636 0.262 -3.358 -0.643 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 356.955 68.633 – -4.356 -5.076 -35.0
Kharchenko et al. 2016 356.93 68.645 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 356.95 68.633 – -1.92 -3.84 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 356.94 68.648 – -4.94 -4.76 -35.0
Gozha et al. 2012 356.95 68.633 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 356.94 68.648 – -4.94 -4.76 -35.0
Kharchenko et al. 2007 356.95 68.63 – 0.04 – –
van den Bergh 2006 356.95 68.633 – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 356.946 68.625 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 356.95 68.633 – -1.92 -3.84 -35.0

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 2.85 3.00 – 4274 0.352 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 2.93 3.02 – 3548 – 5712 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 7096* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.81 3.61 – 1585 -0.660 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.99 3.68 1.85 1242 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 2089 – 4406 – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 3.48* – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 3.43 3.94 – 1096 – – – 18
Dias et al. 2021 2.93 3.02 – 3548 -0.176 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 3.10 2.67 – 4467 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 3.43 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 2090 -0.500 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 3.43 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 3.43 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 2.49 3.59 – 1178 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.85 2.94 – 2089 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.85 2.94 – 2089 -0.270 – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 2.89 – – 1117 -0.270 – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 2.85 2.94 – 2089 -0.270 – – –
van den Bergh 2006 2.89 3.94 – 1122 – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 2.89 3.94 – 1110 -0.230* – – –
Dias et al. 2002 2.89 3.94 – 1117 -0.270 – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️