King 10

(MWSC 3673; OCL 248; FSR 0396; FoF 347)

0.93 UTI

0.89

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N₅₀ (P>50% members) 467

Stellar density (N₅₀/rad) 74.1 [N/pc²]

C3 classification AB

C_N 0.89 Rich
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

King 10 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Distant High extinction Massive Near-solar metallicity Young

Palma et al. (2025)
Classified as optical pair P58, along with HSC_849.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.

Data

🔍 Search references for King 10 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	343.751	59.17	0.278	-2.701	-2.122	-76.079
Almeida et al.	2025	343.741	59.167	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	343.75	59.168	0.281	-2.716	-2.122	-95.919
Celli et al.	2024	343.748	59.17	–	–	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	343.741	59.162	0.278	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	343.75	59.168	0.281	-2.716	-2.122	-95.919
Just et al.	2023	343.748	59.166	–	–	–	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	343.75	59.166	0.301	-2.737	-2.078	–
Rain et al.	2021	343.748	59.17	0.259	-2.722	-2.088	–
Dias et al.	2021	343.741	59.167	0.242	-2.747	-2.087	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	343.748	59.17	0.259	-2.722	-2.088	–
Zhong et al.	2020	343.748	59.17	–	-2.722	-2.088	-47.315
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	343.748	59.17	0.259	-2.722	-2.088	–
Liu & Pang	2019	343.735	59.171	0.263	-2.825	-2.081	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	343.748	59.17	–	–	–	-63.05
Bica et al.	2019	343.735	59.176	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	343.748	59.17	0.259	-2.722	-2.088	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	343.755	59.167	–	-2.052	2.164	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	343.748	59.166	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	343.725	59.167	–	-2.04	-3.03	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	343.755	59.17	–	-2.44	2.71	–
Gozha et al.	2012	343.725	59.167	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	343.755	59.17	–	-2.44	2.71	–
Bukowiecki et al.	2011	343.746	59.17	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	343.725	59.167	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	343.725	59.167	–	-2.04	-3.03	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	3.33	3.505	2.15	28	0.090	1362	–	0.0
Almeida et al.	2025	3.23	3.14	–	26	–	1310	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	4027⁽¹⁾	–	–
Celli et al.	2024	–	–	–	17	–	1849	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	3.18	3.51	–	115	0.550	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	3.22	3.49	2.15	27	–	–	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	67	–	1309	–	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	3.33⁽¹⁾	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Rain et al.	2021	3.48	3.50	–	28	–	–	–	0
Dias et al.	2021	3.23	3.14	–	26	0.133	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	3.93	3.43	–	17	–	–	–	–
Zhong et al.	2020	2.75	3.87	–	7825	0.000	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	3.48	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Liu & Pang	2019	–	–	–	204	-1.000	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	3.48	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	3.48	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	3.24	3.49	–	28	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	2.75	3.87	–	67	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	2.75	3.87	–	67	–	–	–	–
Bukowiecki et al.	2012	–	–	–	–	–	1362	–	–
Gozha et al.	2012	3.38	–	–	28	0.090	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	2.75	3.87	–	67	–	–	–	–
Bukowiecki et al.	2011	4.83⁽¹⁾	3.41	–	40	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	3.38	3.53	–	28	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	3.38	3.53	–	28	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3