King 10
(MWSC 3673; OCL 248; FSR 0396; FoF 347)
0.93
UTI
0.89
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
2.4 [arcmin]
- CN 0.89 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
King 10 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Distant
High extinction
Massive
Near-solar metallicity
Young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 343.751 | 59.17 | 0.278 | -2.701 | -2.122 | -76.079 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 343.741 | 59.167 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 343.75 | 59.168 | 0.281 | -2.716 | -2.122 | -95.919 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 343.748 | 59.17 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 343.741 | 59.162 | 0.278 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 343.75 | 59.168 | 0.281 | -2.716 | -2.122 | -95.919 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 343.748 | 59.166 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 343.75 | 59.166 | 0.301 | -2.737 | -2.078 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 343.748 | 59.17 | 0.259 | -2.722 | -2.088 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 343.741 | 59.167 | 0.242 | -2.747 | -2.087 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 343.748 | 59.17 | 0.259 | -2.722 | -2.088 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 343.748 | 59.17 | 0.259 | -2.722 | -2.088 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 343.735 | 59.171 | 0.263 | -2.825 | -2.081 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 343.748 | 59.17 | â | â | â | -63.05 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 343.735 | 59.176 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 343.748 | 59.17 | 0.259 | -2.722 | -2.088 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 343.755 | 59.167 | â | -2.052 | 2.164 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 343.748 | 59.166 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 343.725 | 59.167 | â | -2.04 | -3.03 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 343.755 | 59.17 | â | -2.44 | 2.71 | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 343.725 | 59.167 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 343.755 | 59.17 | â | -2.44 | 2.71 | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 343.725 | 59.167 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 343.725 | 59.167 | â | -2.04 | -3.03 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 3.23 | 3.14 | â | 26 | â | 1310 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 4027* | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 17 | â | 1849 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 3.18 | 3.51 | â | 115 | 0.550 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 3.22 | 3.49 | 2.15 | 27 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 67 | â | 1309 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 3.33* | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 3.48 | 3.50 | â | 28 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 3.23 | 3.14 | â | 26 | 0.133 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 3.93 | 3.43 | â | 17 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 3.48 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 204 | -1.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 3.48 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 3.48 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 3.24 | 3.49 | â | 28 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 2.75 | 3.87 | â | 67 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 2.75 | 3.87 | â | 67 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 3.38 | â | â | 28 | 0.090 | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 2.75 | 3.87 | â | 67 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 3.38 | 3.53 | â | 28 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 3.38 | 3.53 | â | 28 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.