IC 348

(MWSC 301; OCSN 203)

0.98 UTI

0.88

C_N

1.0

C_dens

1.0

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N₅₀ (P>50% members) 446

Stellar density (N₅₀/rad) 563.7 [N/pc²]

C3 classification AA

C_N 0.88 Rich
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 1.0 Very high quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

IC 348 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption, age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Very close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Very young

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Silver sample.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.

Lada & Lada (2003)
Embedded cluster within ∼2 Kpc of the Sun.

Data

🔍 Search references for IC 348 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	56.124	32.155	3.172	4.417	-6.338	13.17
Wei et al.	2025	56.141	32.165	3.148	4.447	-6.345	–
Almeida et al.	2025	56.135	32.184	–	–	–	–
Alfonso et al.	2024	56.107	32.159	3.129	4.432	-6.336	–
Zhang et al.	2024	56.137	32.177	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	56.137	32.177	3.164	4.423	-6.343	11.679
Celli et al.	2024	56.132	32.159	–	–	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	56.004	32.199	3.166	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	56.137	32.177	3.164	4.423	-6.343	11.679
Qin et al.	2023	56.14	32.15	3.17	4.47	-6.3	11.18
Just et al.	2023	56.144	32.149	–	–	–	–
He et al.	2022	55.621	32.304	3.261	4.86	-6.993	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	56.124	32.159	3.113	4.472	-6.437	–
Rain et al.	2021	56.132	32.159	3.079	4.483	-6.447	–
Richer et al.	2021	56.132	32.165	3.108	4.308	-6.722	–
Dias et al.	2021	56.135	32.184	3.08	4.43	-6.508	21.013
Spina et al.	2021	56.128	32.161	3.081	4.347	-6.563	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	56.132	32.159	3.079	4.483	-6.447	–
Donor et al.	2020	56.153	32.15	–	4.38	-6.26	16.7
Zhong et al.	2020	56.132	32.159	–	4.483	-6.447	17.531
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	56.132	32.159	3.079	4.483	-6.447	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	56.132	32.159	–	–	–	19.71
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	56.132	32.159	3.079	4.483	-6.447	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	56.145	32.163	–	3.866	-12.586	16.0
Kharchenko et al.	2016	56.144	32.149	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	56.142	32.163	–	3.38	-7.37	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	56.152	32.15	–	4.33	-10.17	16.0
Gozha et al.	2012	56.142	32.163	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	56.152	32.15	–	4.05	-9.9	16.03
Bukowiecki et al.	2011	56.154	32.159	–	–	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	56.136	32.157	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2007	56.14	32.16	–	0.13	–	11.25
van den Bergh	2006	56.142	32.163	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	56.14	32.16	–	5.37	-7.43	14.0
Lada & Lada	2003	56.09	32.171	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2003	56.1	32.15	–	7.54	-9.32	–
Dias et al.	2002	56.142	32.163	–	3.38	-7.37	18.1

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	0.34	2.54	2.48	11	-0.035	148	0.55	0.0
Wei et al.	2025	0.20	0.45	–	9	-0.250	220	0.55	–
Almeida et al.	2025	0.32	0.33	–	6	–	135	–	–
Alfonso et al.	2024	0.33	1.91	–	11	0.302	–	–	–
Zhang et al.	2024	–	–	–	–	-0.154⁽¹⁾	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	187⁽¹⁾	–	–
Celli et al.	2024	–	–	–	12	–	101	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	0.37	2.97	–	4	0.060	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	0.31	2.54	2.48	6	–	–	–	–
Qin et al.	2023	0.36	0.34	–	2	–	–	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	6	–	15	–	–
He et al.	2022	–	0.20	–	3	–	–	–	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	0.32⁽¹⁾	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Rain et al.	2021	0.32	2.85	–	44	–	–	–	0
Richer et al.	2021	–	3.25	–	12	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	0.32	0.33	–	6	0.302	–	–	–
Spina et al.	2021	0.33	–	–	12	-0.035⁽²⁰⁾	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	0.34	1.91	–	12	–	–	–	–
Donor et al.	2020	–	–	–	–	-0.110	–	–	–
Zhong et al.	2020	0.00	0.00	–	0	-0.169	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	0.32	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	0.32	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	0.32	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	0.37	3.05	–	55	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	0.48	3.25	–	6	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	0.48	3.25	–	6	–	–	–	–
Bukowiecki et al.	2012	–	–	–	–	–	223	–	–
Gozha et al.	2012	0.39	–	–	44	0.030	5	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	0.48	3.25	–	6	–	–	–	–
Bukowiecki et al.	2011	0.42⁽¹⁾	3.53	–	56	–	–	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	0.39	2.54	–	62	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	0.39	2.88	–	44	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	0.39	2.54	–	62	–	–	–	–
Lada & Lada	2003	0.32	–	–	–	–	160	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2003	0.38	1.08	–	–	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	0.39	2.88	–	44	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3