IC 2395

(MWSC 1537; FoF 2288)

Click to load Aladin Lite
1.0 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
C3 classification AA
Number of members (P>50%) 517
Radius (P>50% members) 10.9 [arcmin]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique
đŸ“Ĩ Members 📊 Colab đŸ”Ŧ Bayestar19 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (Îą, δ) 🔍 Simbad (Îą, δ)

Overview
ℹī¸
IC 2395 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Note: This object shares a moderate percentage of members with 2 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.

Close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Very young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data
🔍 Search references for IC 2395 in: SciX Simbad
ℹī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 130.523 -48.1 1.403 -4.443 3.32 22.316
Li et al. 2025 130.531 -48.09 1.379 -4.464 3.293 –
Wei et al. 2025 130.473 -48.025 1.411 -4.511 3.429 –
Almeida et al. 2025 130.471 -48.072 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 130.471 -48.01 1.377 -4.506 3.415 –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 130.62 -48.134 1.404 -4.487 3.371 23.948
Celli et al. 2024 130.531 -48.09 – – – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 130.325 -47.976 1.407 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 130.62 -48.134 1.404 -4.487 3.371 23.948
Almeida et al. 2023 130.457 -48.061 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 130.646 -48.13 – – – –
He et al. 2022 130.466 -48.053 1.409 -4.464 3.365 –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 130.586 -48.137 1.409 -4.393 3.193 –
Rain et al. 2021 130.531 -48.09 1.379 -4.464 3.293 –
Dias et al. 2021 130.471 -48.072 1.375 -4.463 3.258 19.065
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 130.531 -48.09 1.379 -4.464 3.293 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 130.531 -48.09 1.379 -4.464 3.293 –
Liu & Pang 2019 130.484 -48.064 1.386 -4.441 3.231 –
Dias et al. 2019 130.625 -48.113 1.382 -4.385 3.199 23.197
Soubiran et al. 2018 130.531 -48.09 – – – 17.66
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 130.531 -48.09 1.379 -4.464 3.293 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 130.62 -48.112 – -4.424 6.17 13.2
Kharchenko et al. 2016 130.646 -48.13 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 130.625 -48.113 – -6.69 5.87 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 130.65 -48.133 – -5.26 3.97 13.2
Gozha et al. 2012 130.625 -48.113 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 130.621 -48.107 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 130.62 -48.11 – 0.35 – 13.25
Piskunov et al. 2007 130.621 -48.107 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 130.654 -48.113 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 130.62 -48.11 – -4.34 2.42 25.0
Chen et al. 2003 130.345 -48.212 – -3.6 2.21 0.5
Dias et al. 2002 130.625 -48.113 – -6.69 5.87 8.99
Dambis 1999 130.629 -48.1 – – – –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 0.71 0.39 – 13 0.045 – – –
Wei et al. 2025 0.67 0.76 – 21 -0.250 786 0.63 –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.71 0.47 – 14 – 675 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.70 0.51 – 14 -0.008 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 782* – –
Celli et al. 2024 – – – 20 – 389 – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.73 0.75 – 3 -0.370 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.69 0.30 1.42 7 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 0.69 0.47 – 13 -0.034 484* 0.40 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 19 – 30 – –
He et al. 2022 – 0.25 – 8 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 0.71* – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 0.71 0.28 – 6 – – – 0
Dias et al. 2021 0.71 0.47 – 14 -0.007 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.70 0.51 – 20 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.71 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 11 -0.750 – – –
Dias et al. 2019 0.82 0.46 – 11 -0.419 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 0.71 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 0.71 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 0.71 0.20 – 17 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 0.70 0.45 – 19 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 0.70 0.45 – 19 0.000 – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 0.80 – – 6 0.000 316 – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 0.71 0.22 – 12 – 176* – –
Piskunov et al. 2007 0.71 0.22 – 12 – 75 – –
van den Bergh 2006 0.70 0.22 – 17 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 0.71 0.22 – 12 – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 0.70 – – 10 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 0.80 0.28 – 6 0.000 – – –
Dambis 1999 0.66 0.23 – 20 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Cluster % RA DEC Plx pmRA pmDE Rv UTI
VDBH 47 45.6 130.62 -48.13 1.4 -4.39 3.25 24.56 0.0
OC 0489 3.1 129.93 -47.6 1.42 -4.65 3.67 18.42 0.09

💡 Note: The % column shows the percentage of members that IC 2395 shares with each listed object.

Visualization
ℹī¸
IC 2395 UCC
IC 2395 HUNT23
IC 2395 CANTAT20
Galactocentric position diagram