IC 1396
(MWSC 3539)
0.95
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
11.2 [arcmin]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
IC 1396 is a very rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Very young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 324.765 | 57.501 | 1.077 | -2.366 | -4.653 | -19.823 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 324.744 | 57.564 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 324.804 | 57.533 | 1.04 | -2.265 | -4.579 | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 324.753 | 57.494 | 1.078 | -2.336 | -4.573 | -11.69 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 324.745 | 57.514 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 324.807 | 57.566 | 1.077 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 324.753 | 57.494 | 1.078 | -2.336 | -4.573 | -11.69 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 324.745 | 57.487 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 324.769 | 57.536 | 1.069 | -2.374 | -4.598 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 324.745 | 57.514 | 1.066 | -2.355 | -4.495 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 324.744 | 57.564 | 1.064 | -2.361 | -4.539 | -11.537 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 324.745 | 57.514 | 1.066 | -2.355 | -4.495 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 324.745 | 57.514 | 1.066 | -2.355 | -4.495 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 324.745 | 57.514 | â | â | â | -19.04 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 324.745 | 57.514 | 1.066 | -2.355 | -4.495 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 324.745 | 57.487 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 324.75 | 57.49 | â | -2.29 | -4.05 | -12.4 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 324.75 | 57.49 | â | -2.29 | -4.05 | -12.4 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 324.724 | 57.483 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 324.78 | 57.5 | â | 0.65 | â | -15.35 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 324.724 | 57.483 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 324.73 | 57.49 | â | -2.21 | -4.06 | -15.35 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 324.72 | 57.49 | â | -3.38 | -3.7 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.91 | 1.63 | â | 5 | â | 1116 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.91 | 1.59 | â | 10 | -0.022 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 1073* | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 12 | â | 614 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.07 | 1.75 | â | 4 | -0.090 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.90 | 1.70 | 2.59 | 4 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 1 | â | 227 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 2.05 | â | 3 | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 0.91 | 1.46 | â | 11 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.91 | 1.63 | â | 5 | -0.023 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.91 | 1.59 | â | 12 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.91 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.91 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.91 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.60 | 1.31 | â | 1 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.60 | 1.31 | â | 1 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 0.60 | 1.31 | â | 1 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.83 | 1.46 | â | 5 | â | 1991* | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.83 | 1.46 | â | 5 | â | 575 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.83 | 1.46 | â | 5 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 0.83 | 1.46 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Bronze sample.