Hogg 6

(MWSC 1766; OCL 805; ESO 127 08)

0.14 UTI

0.0

C_N

0.01

C_dens

0.0

C_C3

0.35

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 20

Core radius and density 2.8 [pc], 0.04 [pc^-2]

C3 classification DD

C_N 0.0 Sparse
C_dens 0.01 Very loose
C_C3 0.0 Very low quality
C_lit 0.35 Poorly studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Hogg 6 is a sparse, very loose object of very low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate^* distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as an intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~3.77 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.41 kpc).

⚠️ Warning: the low UTI value and no obvious signs of duplication (C_dup=1.0) indicate that this is quite probably an asterism, moving group, or artifact, and not a real open cluster.

Relatively close Low extinction Intermediate age

Data

🔍 Search references for Hogg 6 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	151.611	-60.483	0.265	-7.327	2.459	–
Just et al.	2023	151.645	-60.496	–	–	–	–
Bica et al.	2019	151.623	-60.489	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2018	–	–	–	-7.48	2.12	–
Dib et al.	2018	151.65	-60.5	–	–	–	–
Sampedro et al.	2017	151.654	-60.5	–	-2.83	0.52	–
Joshi et al.	2016	151.65	-60.5	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	151.645	-60.496	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	151.654	-60.5	–	-3.04	0.74	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	151.65	-60.5	–	-8.38	-0.1	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	151.64	-60.495	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	151.65	-60.5	–	-8.19	0.85	–
Kharchenko et al.	2003	151.62	-60.47	–	-7.96	0.49	–
Lynga	1987	151.611	-60.497	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.41	0.405	–	320	–	56	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	320	–	25	–	–
Dib et al.	2018	1.41	–	–	320	–	–	–	–
Joshi et al.	2016	1.41	0.49	–	320	–	87	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	1.41	0.49	–	320	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	1.41	0.49	–	320	–	–	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	1.60	0.16	–	407	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	1.60	0.16	–	407	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2003	2.00	0.32	–	–	–	–	–	–

Visualization

ℹ️