Hogg 14

(MWSC 2037)

0.16 UTI

0.0

C_N

0.04

C_dens

0.12

C_C3

0.32

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 12

Core radius and density 1.8 [pc], 0.2 [pc^-2]

C3 classification DC

C_N 0.0 Sparse
C_dens 0.04 Very loose
C_C3 0.12 Very low quality
C_lit 0.32 Poorly studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Hogg 14 is a sparse, very loose object of very low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate^* distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a low-mass, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~3.89 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.04 kpc).

⚠️ Warning: the low UTI value and no obvious signs of duplication (C_dup=1.0) indicate that this is quite probably an asterism, moving group, or artifact, and not a real open cluster.

Relatively close Low extinction Low mass Intermediate age

Data

🔍 Search references for Hogg 14 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	187.208	-59.837	0.257	-7.812	0.376	–
Just et al.	2023	187.175	-59.806	–	–	–	–
Dib et al.	2018	187.185	-59.81	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	187.155	-59.817	–	-12.067	-5.766	–
Sampedro et al.	2017	187.15	-59.817	–	-4.76	-1.69	–
Joshi et al.	2016	187.185	-59.81	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	187.175	-59.806	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	187.15	-59.817	–	-6.41	-1.27	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	187.185	-59.81	–	-9.48	-4.0	–
van den Bergh	2006	187.162	-59.8	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	187.15	-59.817	–	-9.22	1.08	–
Lynga	1987	187.17	-59.805	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.04	0.72	–	126	–	19	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	126	–	19	–	–
Dib et al.	2018	1.04	–	–	126	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	1.34	0.81	–	108	–	–	–	–
Joshi et al.	2016	1.04	0.72	–	126	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	1.04	0.72	–	126	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	1.04	0.72	–	126	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	0.97	0.73	–	126	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	0.97	0.72	–	126	–	–	–	–
Lynga	1987	–	–	–	316	–	–	–	–

Visualization

ℹ️