Hogg 10

(MWSC 1908)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.82 UTI
0.36
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.86
Clit
1.0
Cdup
N50 (P>50% members) 36
Radius (P>50% members) 3.3 [arcmin]
C3 classification AA
  • CN 0.36 Poorly populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 0.86 Well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique
đŸ“Ĩ Members 📊 Colab đŸ”Ŧ Bayestar19 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (Îą, δ) 🔍 Simbad (Îą, δ)

Overview
ℹī¸
Hogg 10 is a poorly populated, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.

Note: This object shares a moderate percentage of members with at least one entry reported in the same catalogue. See table with shared members information.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.

Data
🔍 Search references for Hogg 10 in: SciX Simbad
ℹī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 167.679 -60.406 0.391 -6.205 1.787 -10.868
Almeida et al. 2025 167.687 -60.388 – – – –
Celli et al. 2024 167.663 -60.385 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 167.679 -60.381 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 167.657 -60.338 0.411 -6.198 1.881 –
Rain et al. 2021 167.663 -60.385 0.382 -6.201 1.754 –
Dias et al. 2021 167.687 -60.388 0.383 -6.189 1.765 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 167.663 -60.385 0.382 -6.201 1.754 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 167.663 -60.385 0.382 -6.201 1.754 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 167.663 -60.385 0.382 -6.201 1.754 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 167.685 -60.385 – -8.72 -1.036 -7.0
Kharchenko et al. 2016 167.679 -60.381 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 167.675 -60.4 – -4.55 -1.01 1.0
Kharchenko et al. 2013 167.685 -60.385 – -9.75 2.06 -7.0
van den Bergh 2006 167.675 -60.367 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 167.675 -60.4 – -4.55 -1.01 1.0
Dambis 1999 167.675 -60.367 – – – –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 2.44 1.4 – 6 0.017 120 – 0.0
Almeida et al. 2025 2.46 1.38 – 6 – 182 – –
Celli et al. 2024 – – – 6 – 120 – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 6 – 33 – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 2.44(1) – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 2.44 1.43 – 6 – – – 0
Dias et al. 2021 2.46 1.38 – 6 0.017 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.44 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.44 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 1.77 1.40 – 7 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.92 1.29 – 6 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.92 1.29 – 6 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 1.78 1.43 – 6 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.78 1.43 – 6 – – – –
Dambis 1999 2.51 1.49 – 45 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Cluster % RA DEC Plx pmRA pmDE Rv UTI
NGC 3572 50.0 167.65 -60.31 0.38 -6.25 1.9 -4.92 0.95
Teutsch 227 19.4 167.49 -60.31 0.37 -6.22 1.85 -28.47 0.15

💡 Note: The % column shows the percentage of members that Hogg 10 shares with each listed object.

Visualization
ℹī¸
Hogg 10 UCC
Hogg 10 CANTAT20
Galactocentric position diagram