Hogg 10

(MWSC 1908)

0.30 UTI

0.36

C_N

0.18

C_dens

1.0

C_C3

0.73

C_lit

0.5

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 36

Core radius and density 2.6 [pc], 0.9 [pc^-2]

C3 classification AA

C_N 0.36 Poorly populated
C_dens 0.18 Very loose
C_C3 1.0 Very high quality
C_lit 0.73 Moderately studied
C_dup 0.5 Likely unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Hogg 10 is a poorly populated, very loose object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

Note: This is likely a unique object, which shares a moderate percentage of members with at least one previously reported entry. See table with shared members information.

Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Very young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.

Piecka & Paunzen (2021)
Belongs to cluster aggregate 'Agg44' along with NGC 3572.

Ahumada & Lapasset (2007)
The apparent cluster diameter was taken from (1976AJ.....81..155C).

Data

🔍 Search references for Hogg 10 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	167.679	-60.406	0.391	-6.205	1.787	-10.868
Almeida et al.	2025	167.687	-60.388	–	–	–	–
Celli et al.	2024	167.663	-60.385	–	–	–	–
Just et al.	2023	167.679	-60.381	–	–	–	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	167.657	-60.338	0.411	-6.198	1.881	–
Rain et al.	2021	167.663	-60.385	0.382	-6.201	1.754	–
Dias et al.	2021	167.687	-60.388	0.383	-6.189	1.765	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	167.663	-60.385	0.382	-6.201	1.754	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	167.663	-60.385	0.382	-6.201	1.754	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	167.663	-60.385	0.382	-6.201	1.754	–
Dib et al.	2018	167.685	-60.385	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	167.685	-60.385	–	-8.72	-1.036	-7.0
Sampedro et al.	2017	167.675	-60.4	–	-3.87	-2.18	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	167.679	-60.381	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	167.675	-60.4	–	-4.55	-1.01	1.0
Kharchenko et al.	2013	167.685	-60.385	–	-9.75	2.06	-7.0
Ahumada & Lapasset	2007	167.675	-60.4	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	167.675	-60.367	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	167.675	-60.4	–	-4.55	-1.01	1.0
Dambis	1999	167.675	-60.367	–	–	–	–
Lynga	1987	167.696	-60.379	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	2.44	1.44	–	6	0.017	120	–	0
Almeida et al.	2025	2.46	1.38	–	6	–	182	–	–
Celli et al.	2024	–	–	–	6	–	120	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	6	–	33	–	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	2.44⁽¹⁾	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Rain et al.	2021	2.44	1.45	–	6	–	–	–	0
Dias et al.	2021	2.46	1.38	–	6	0.017	–	–	–
Kounkel et al.	2020	2.49	1.49	–	20	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	2.44	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	2.44	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Dib et al.	2018	1.92	–	–	6	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	1.77	1.43	–	7	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	1.92	1.31	–	6	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	1.92	1.31	–	6	–	–	–	–
Ahumada & Lapasset	2007	–	1.45	–	6	–	–	–	0
van den Bergh	2006	1.78	1.45	–	6	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	1.78	1.45	–	6	–	–	–	–
Dambis	1999	2.51	1.52	–	45	–	–	–	–
Lynga	1987	2.20	1.39	–	2	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Cluster	%	RA	DEC	Plx	pmRA	pmDE	Rv	UTI
NGC 3572	50.0	167.65	-60.31	0.38	-6.25	1.9	-4.92	0.89
Teutsch 227	19.4	167.49	-60.31	0.37	-6.22	1.85	-28.47	0.1

💡 Note: The % column shows the percentage of members that Hogg 10 shares with each listed object.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2