Haffner 8

(OCL 578; MWSC 1200; FoF 376)

0.92 UTI

0.84

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

C3 classification AB

Number of members (P>50%) 342

Radius (P>50% members) 3.9 [arcmin]

C_N 0.84 Rich
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Haffner 8 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

🔍 Search references for Haffner 8 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	–	110.771	-12.307	0.326	-1.611	0.474	58.585
Li et al.	2025	110.777	-12.31	0.314	-1.626	0.446	–
Almeida et al.	2025	110.784	-12.315	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	110.772	-12.303	0.335	-1.62	0.475	57.369
Cavallo et al.	2024	110.772	-12.309	0.333	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	110.772	-12.303	0.335	-1.62	0.475	57.369
Almeida et al.	2023	110.776	-12.319	–	–	–	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	110.768	-12.309	0.352	-1.608	0.425	–
Rain et al.	2021	110.777	-12.31	0.314	-1.626	0.446	–
Dias et al.	2021	110.784	-12.315	0.311	-1.634	0.448	61.879
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	110.777	-12.31	0.314	-1.626	0.446	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	110.777	-12.31	0.314	-1.626	0.446	–
Liu & Pang	2019	110.771	-12.322	0.317	-1.598	0.456	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	110.777	-12.31	–	–	–	61.49
Bica et al.	2019	110.765	-12.294	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	110.777	-12.31	0.314	-1.626	0.446	–
Dias et al.	2014	110.85	-12.333	–	-3.6	-0.73	–
Gozha et al.	2012	110.85	-12.333	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	110.85	-12.333	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	110.85	-12.333	–	-3.6	-0.73	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	Bfr	BSS
Li et al.	2025	2.87	1.17	–	288	0.138	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	2.51	1.29	–	286	–	553	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	830*	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	3.03	1.30	–	302	0.540	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	2.62	0.91	0.71	340	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2023	2.50	1.29	–	340	-0.116	633*	0.52	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	2.84*	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Rain et al.	2021	2.91	0.09	–	316	–	–	–	0
Dias et al.	2021	2.51	1.29	–	286	-0.078	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	3.01	1.16	–	240	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	2.91	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Liu & Pang	2019	–	–	–	63	0.500	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	2.91	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	2.91	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Gozha et al.	2012	1.18	–	–	1413	0.020	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	1.18	0.09	–	1413	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	2.38	0.10	–	316	0.060	–	–	–

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3