Gulliver 9

(FoF 2401; OCSN 195)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.96 UTI
0.82
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 22.0 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.82 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Gulliver 9 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Very young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 127.091 -47.932 1.989 -5.926 6.88 22.354
Li et al. 2025 126.998 -47.929 1.985 -5.992 6.915 –
Wei et al. 2025 127.226 -47.852 1.996 -5.923 6.85 –
Almeida et al. 2025 126.744 -47.82 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 127.033 -47.88 1.963 -5.982 6.912 –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 127.204 -47.925 2.0 -5.931 6.935 22.706
Celli et al. 2024 126.998 -47.929 – – – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 126.797 -47.873 1.997 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 127.204 -47.925 2.0 -5.931 6.935 22.706
Qin et al. 2023 127.12 -47.91 2.0 -6.05 6.99 21.91
He et al. 2022 127.124 -47.922 1.996 -5.926 6.882 –
Dias et al. 2021 126.744 -47.82 1.977 -5.998 6.893 29.621
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 126.998 -47.929 1.985 -5.992 6.915 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 126.998 -47.929 1.985 -5.992 6.915 –
Liu & Pang 2019 127.075 -47.903 1.954 -5.915 6.778 –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 126.998 -47.929 – – – 2.374
Bossini et al. 2019 126.998 -47.929 – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 126.998 -47.929 – – – 23.3
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 126.998 -47.929 1.985 -5.992 6.915 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 0.47 0.34 – 17 -0.046 – – –
Wei et al. 2025 0.52 0.71 – 5 -0.250 227 0.48 –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.48 0.40 – 21 – 313 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.56 0.42 – 20 -0.038 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 267* – –
Celli et al. 2024 – – – 18 – 276 – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.52 0.62 – 4 -0.300 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.49 0.21 0.64 10 – – – –
Qin et al. 2023 0.66 0.71 – 18 – – – –
He et al. 2022 – 0.35 – 14 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 0.48 0.40 – 21 -0.038 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.56 0.42 – 18 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.50 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 38 -0.500 – – –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 0.47 0.44 – 20 0.012 – – –
Bossini et al. 2019 0.46 0.14 – 14 0.000 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 0.50 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 0.50 – – – – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸