Gulliver 9

(FoF 2401; OCSN 195)

0.96 UTI

0.82

C_N

1.0

C_dens

1.0

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N₅₀ (P>50% members) 287

Stellar density (N₅₀/rad) 27.7 [N/pc²]

C3 classification AA

C_N 0.82 Rich
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 1.0 Very high quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Gulliver 9 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Very young

Liu et al. (2025)
Classified as primordial binary cluster 21 along with Alessi_34.

Palma et al. (2025)
Part of multiple system G33, along with Alessi_34 and CWNU_1150.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Data

🔍 Search references for Gulliver 9 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	127.091	-47.932	1.989	-5.926	6.88	22.354
Li et al.	2025	126.998	-47.929	1.985	-5.992	6.915	–
Wei et al.	2025	127.226	-47.852	1.996	-5.923	6.85	–
Almeida et al.	2025	126.744	-47.82	–	–	–	–
Alfonso et al.	2024	127.033	-47.88	1.963	-5.982	6.912	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	127.204	-47.925	2.0	-5.931	6.935	22.706
Celli et al.	2024	126.998	-47.929	–	–	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	126.797	-47.873	1.997	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	127.204	-47.925	2.0	-5.931	6.935	22.706
Qin et al.	2023	127.12	-47.91	2.0	-6.05	6.99	21.91
He et al.	2022	127.124	-47.922	1.996	-5.926	6.882	–
Dias et al.	2021	126.744	-47.82	1.977	-5.998	6.893	29.621
Spina et al.	2021	126.925	-47.922	1.98	-5.974	6.896	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	126.998	-47.929	1.985	-5.992	6.915	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	126.998	-47.929	1.985	-5.992	6.915	–
Liu & Pang	2019	127.075	-47.903	1.954	-5.915	6.778	–
Monteiro & Dias	2019	126.998	-47.929	–	–	–	2.374
Bossini et al.	2019	126.998	-47.929	–	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	126.998	-47.929	–	–	–	23.3
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	126.998	-47.929	1.985	-5.992	6.915	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	0.5	0.4	0.64	18	-0.042	272	0.48	–
Liu et al.	2025	0.53	0.11	–	18	–	–	–	–
Li et al.	2025	0.47	0.34	–	17	-0.046	–	–	–
Wei et al.	2025	0.52	0.71	–	5	-0.250	227	0.48	–
Almeida et al.	2025	0.48	0.40	–	21	–	313	–	–
Alfonso et al.	2024	0.56	0.42	–	20	-0.038	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	267⁽¹⁾	–	–
Celli et al.	2024	–	–	–	18	–	276	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	0.52	0.62	–	4	-0.300	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	0.49	0.21	0.64	10	–	–	–	–
Qin et al.	2023	0.66	0.71	–	18	–	–	–	–
He et al.	2022	–	0.35	–	14	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	0.48	0.40	–	21	-0.038	–	–	–
Spina et al.	2021	0.51	–	–	18	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	0.56	0.42	–	18	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	0.50	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Liu & Pang	2019	–	–	–	38	-0.500	–	–	–
Monteiro & Dias	2019	0.47	0.44	–	20	0.012	–	–	–
Bossini et al.	2019	0.46	0.14	–	14	0.000	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	0.50	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	0.50	–	–	–	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3