Gulliver 8
0.21
UTI
0.59
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.55
Clit
0.31
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
11.2 [arcmin]
- CN 0.59 Moderately populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.55 Moderately studied
- Cdup 0.31 Possibly duplicate
Overview
Gulliver 8 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
â ī¸ Warning: This is possibly a duplicate object, which shares a significant percentage of members with at least one previously reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Relatively close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 80.561 | 33.787 | 0.903 | -0.298 | -3.069 | 6.266 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 80.548 | 33.798 | â | â | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 80.56 | 33.792 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 80.565 | 33.803 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 80.565 | 33.791 | 0.916 | -0.275 | -3.072 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 80.548 | 33.798 | 0.857 | -0.224 | -2.982 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 80.56 | 33.792 | 0.872 | -0.156 | -2.982 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 80.56 | 33.792 | 0.872 | -0.156 | -2.982 | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 80.56 | 33.792 | â | â | â | 2.277 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 80.56 | 33.792 | 0.872 | -0.156 | -2.982 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.11 | 0.99 | â | 29 | â | 131 | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 21 | â | 103 | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.04 | 1.05 | â | 27 | -0.022 | 156* | 0.67 | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 1.00 | â | 18 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.11 | 0.99 | â | 29 | 0.071 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.14 | 0.52 | â | 21 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.11 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 1.13 | 1.04 | â | 21 | 0.012 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.11 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.