Gulliver 7

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.80 UTI
0.79
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.6
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 1.8 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.79 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 0.6 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Gulliver 7 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large* distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~8.87 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~6.31 kpc).

Very distant Moderate extinction Massive Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 141.746 -55.125 0.113 -3.54 3.137 53.007
Almeida et al. 2025 141.751 -55.126 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 141.757 -55.125 0.117 -3.54 3.147 47.086
Cavallo et al. 2024 141.736 -55.127 0.116 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 141.757 -55.125 0.117 -3.54 3.147 47.086
Dias et al. 2021 141.751 -55.126 0.081 -3.566 3.092 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 141.746 -55.127 0.084 -3.547 3.108 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 141.746 -55.127 0.084 -3.547 3.108 –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 141.746 -55.127 – – – 2.121
Soubiran et al. 2018 141.746 -55.127 – – – 55.66
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 141.746 -55.127 0.084 -3.547 3.108 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Almeida et al. 2025 4.63 1.92 – 421 – 782 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 2792* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 4.61 2.12 – 457 -0.370 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 7.43 2.15 1.64 195 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 4.63 1.92 – 421 -0.123 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 5.52 1.50 – 479 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 8.84 – – – – – – –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 6.31 2.65 – 7 0.002 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 8.84 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 8.84 – – – – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸