Gulliver 7
0.80
UTI
0.79
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.6
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
1.8 [arcmin]
- CN 0.79 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 0.6 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Gulliver 7 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large* distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
(*): The parallax distance estimate (~8.87 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~6.31 kpc).
Very distant
Moderate extinction
Massive
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 141.746 | -55.125 | 0.113 | -3.54 | 3.137 | 53.007 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 141.751 | -55.126 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 141.757 | -55.125 | 0.117 | -3.54 | 3.147 | 47.086 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 141.736 | -55.127 | 0.116 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 141.757 | -55.125 | 0.117 | -3.54 | 3.147 | 47.086 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 141.751 | -55.126 | 0.081 | -3.566 | 3.092 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 141.746 | -55.127 | 0.084 | -3.547 | 3.108 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 141.746 | -55.127 | 0.084 | -3.547 | 3.108 | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 141.746 | -55.127 | â | â | â | 2.121 |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 141.746 | -55.127 | â | â | â | 55.66 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 141.746 | -55.127 | 0.084 | -3.547 | 3.108 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 4.63 | 1.92 | â | 421 | â | 782 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 2792* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 4.61 | 2.12 | â | 457 | -0.370 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 7.43 | 2.15 | 1.64 | 195 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 4.63 | 1.92 | â | 421 | -0.123 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 5.52 | 1.50 | â | 479 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 8.84 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 6.31 | 2.65 | â | 7 | 0.002 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 8.84 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 8.84 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.