Gulliver 6
(FoF 2374)
0.68
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.75
Clit
0.75
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
34.4 [arcmin]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 0.75 Well-studied
- Cdup 0.75 Very likely unique
Overview
Gulliver 6 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Note: This is very likely a unique object, which shares a small percentage of members with at least one previously reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Very close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Very young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 83.339 | -1.629 | 2.408 | -0.069 | -0.236 | 28.058 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 83.278 | -1.652 | 2.367 | -0.007 | -0.207 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 83.275 | -1.659 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 83.401 | -1.699 | 2.361 | -0.107 | -0.133 | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 83.278 | -1.652 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 83.405 | -1.581 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 84.519 | -0.6 | 2.608 | -1.307 | -0.53 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 83.275 | -1.659 | 2.35 | -0.048 | -0.235 | 32.044 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 83.278 | -1.652 | 2.367 | -0.007 | -0.207 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 83.278 | -1.652 | 2.367 | -0.007 | -0.207 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 83.376 | -1.683 | 2.368 | -0.311 | -0.081 | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 83.278 | -1.652 | â | â | â | 2.205 |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 83.278 | -1.652 | â | â | â | 28.35 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 83.278 | -1.652 | 2.367 | -0.007 | -0.207 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.42 | 0.26 | â | 15 | 0.046 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.41 | 0.39 | â | 14 | â | 359 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.38 | 0.25 | â | 10 | -0.095 | â | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 17 | â | 353 | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.41 | 0.48 | â | 13 | -0.034 | 365* | 0.36 | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.05 | â | 14 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.41 | 0.39 | â | 14 | -0.100 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.40 | 0.25 | â | 17 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 14 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 0.43 | 0.52 | â | 12 | 0.015 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.