Gulliver 59

0.54 UTI

0.62

C_N

0.16

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

0.57

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 75

Core radius and density 3.0 [pc], 0.8 [pc^-2]

C3 classification AB

C_N 0.62 Moderately populated
C_dens 0.16 Very loose
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 0.57 Moderately studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Gulliver 59 is a moderately populated, very loose object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Li et al. (2026)
Tidal & Core radii: r_t=19+/-7.8 [pc], r_c=0.46+/-0.02 [pc]; stars within r_t: N~108

Palma et al. (2025)
Part of multiple system G42, along with CWNU_1800 and HSC_2546.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 1.00 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 1.00 (50th percentile).

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.3397, e_all=0.2137.

Data

🔍 Search references for Gulliver 59 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	195.715	-64.604	0.447	-2.429	-1.029	-8.04
Li et al.	2026	195.69	-64.62	–	–	–	–
Schweers & McSwain	2026	195.66	-64.61	–	–	–	–
Li et al.	2025	195.721	-64.6	0.434	-2.408	-1.053	–
Almeida et al.	2025	195.723	-64.611	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	195.718	-64.607	0.45	-2.456	-1.025	-9.479
Cavallo et al.	2024	195.673	-64.634	0.45	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	195.718	-64.607	0.45	-2.456	-1.025	-9.479
Almeida et al.	2023	195.746	-64.625	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	195.723	-64.611	0.438	-2.4	-1.051	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	195.721	-64.6	0.434	-2.408	-1.053	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	195.721	-64.6	0.434	-2.408	-1.053	–
Monteiro & Dias	2019	195.721	-64.6	–	–	–	2.803
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	195.721	-64.6	0.434	-2.408	-1.053	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	2.06	1.455	1.06	104	0.007	411	0.56	–
Schweers & McSwain	2026	2.09	–	–	100	–	–	–	–
Li et al.	2025	1.69	1.19	–	347	-0.132	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	1.98	1.60	–	62	–	371	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	2.06	1.44	1.06	105	–	573⁽¹⁾	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	1.78	1.59	–	427	-0.260	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	2.06	1.44	1.06	104	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2023	1.94	1.55	–	104	0.079	411⁽¹⁾	0.56	–
Dias et al.	2021	1.98	1.60	–	62	0.127	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	2.20	1.14	–	166	–	–	–	–
Kounkel et al.	2020	2.31	1.47	–	158	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	2.16	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Monteiro & Dias	2019	1.79	1.29	–	60	0.007	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	2.16	–	–	–	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3