Gulliver 59
0.66
UTI
0.62
CN
0.61
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.65
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
7.6 [arcmin]
- CN 0.62 Moderately populated
- Cdens 0.61 Moderately dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.65 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Gulliver 59 is a moderately populated, moderately dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 195.715 | -64.604 | 0.447 | -2.429 | -1.029 | -8.04 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 195.721 | -64.6 | 0.434 | -2.408 | -1.053 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 195.723 | -64.611 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 195.718 | -64.607 | 0.45 | -2.456 | -1.025 | -9.479 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 195.673 | -64.634 | 0.45 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 195.718 | -64.607 | 0.45 | -2.456 | -1.025 | -9.479 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 195.746 | -64.625 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 195.723 | -64.611 | 0.438 | -2.4 | -1.051 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 195.721 | -64.6 | 0.434 | -2.408 | -1.053 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 195.721 | -64.6 | 0.434 | -2.408 | -1.053 | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 195.721 | -64.6 | â | â | â | 2.803 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 195.721 | -64.6 | 0.434 | -2.408 | -1.053 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.69 | 1.19 | â | 347 | -0.132 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.98 | 1.60 | â | 62 | â | 371 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 573* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.78 | 1.59 | â | 427 | -0.260 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.06 | 1.44 | 1.06 | 104 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.94 | 1.55 | â | 104 | 0.079 | 411* | 0.56 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.98 | 1.60 | â | 62 | 0.127 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.20 | 1.14 | â | 166 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.16 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 1.79 | 1.27 | â | 60 | 0.007 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.16 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.