Gulliver 59

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.66 UTI
0.62
CN
0.61
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.65
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 7.6 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.62 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 0.61 Moderately dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.65 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Gulliver 59 is a moderately populated, moderately dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 195.715 -64.604 0.447 -2.429 -1.029 -8.04
Li et al. 2025 195.721 -64.6 0.434 -2.408 -1.053 –
Almeida et al. 2025 195.723 -64.611 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 195.718 -64.607 0.45 -2.456 -1.025 -9.479
Cavallo et al. 2024 195.673 -64.634 0.45 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 195.718 -64.607 0.45 -2.456 -1.025 -9.479
Almeida et al. 2023 195.746 -64.625 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 195.723 -64.611 0.438 -2.4 -1.051 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 195.721 -64.6 0.434 -2.408 -1.053 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 195.721 -64.6 0.434 -2.408 -1.053 –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 195.721 -64.6 – – – 2.803
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 195.721 -64.6 0.434 -2.408 -1.053 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 1.69 1.19 – 347 -0.132 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.98 1.60 – 62 – 371 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 573* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.78 1.59 – 427 -0.260 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.06 1.44 1.06 104 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.94 1.55 – 104 0.079 411* 0.56 –
Dias et al. 2021 1.98 1.60 – 62 0.127 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.20 1.14 – 166 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.16 – – – – – – –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 1.79 1.27 – 60 0.007 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.16 – – – – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸