Gulliver 58

(FoF 426)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.79 UTI
0.88
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.65
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 4.6 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.88 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.65 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Gulliver 58 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close High extinction Massive Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 191.516 -61.967 0.413 -3.633 -0.35 -4.028
Almeida et al. 2025 191.504 -61.972 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 191.535 -61.964 0.417 -3.626 -0.348 9.816
Cavallo et al. 2024 191.504 -61.969 0.415 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 191.535 -61.964 0.417 -3.626 -0.348 9.816
Dias et al. 2021 191.504 -61.972 0.395 -3.586 -0.358 9.86
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 191.515 -61.965 0.398 -3.592 -0.353 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 191.515 -61.965 0.398 -3.592 -0.353 –
Liu & Pang 2019 191.521 -61.969 0.396 -3.578 -0.334 –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 191.515 -61.965 – – – 2.299
Soubiran et al. 2018 191.515 -61.965 – – – -1.82
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 191.515 -61.965 0.398 -3.592 -0.353 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Almeida et al. 2025 2.28 3.24 – 504 – 1635 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 3213* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.93 3.82 – 407 0.150 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.22 3.95 2.69 134 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 2.28 3.24 – 504 0.257 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.48 2.76 – 661 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.34 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 813 0.500 – – –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 2.21 3.66 – 34 0.005 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 2.34 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.34 – – – – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸