Gulliver 58
(FoF 426)
0.79
UTI
0.88
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.65
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
4.6 [arcmin]
- CN 0.88 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.65 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Gulliver 58 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close
High extinction
Massive
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 191.516 | -61.967 | 0.413 | -3.633 | -0.35 | -4.028 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 191.504 | -61.972 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 191.535 | -61.964 | 0.417 | -3.626 | -0.348 | 9.816 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 191.504 | -61.969 | 0.415 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 191.535 | -61.964 | 0.417 | -3.626 | -0.348 | 9.816 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 191.504 | -61.972 | 0.395 | -3.586 | -0.358 | 9.86 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 191.515 | -61.965 | 0.398 | -3.592 | -0.353 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 191.515 | -61.965 | 0.398 | -3.592 | -0.353 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 191.521 | -61.969 | 0.396 | -3.578 | -0.334 | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 191.515 | -61.965 | â | â | â | 2.299 |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 191.515 | -61.965 | â | â | â | -1.82 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 191.515 | -61.965 | 0.398 | -3.592 | -0.353 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.28 | 3.24 | â | 504 | â | 1635 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 3213* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.93 | 3.82 | â | 407 | 0.150 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.22 | 3.95 | 2.69 | 134 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.28 | 3.24 | â | 504 | 0.257 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.48 | 2.76 | â | 661 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.34 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 813 | 0.500 | â | â | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 2.21 | 3.66 | â | 34 | 0.005 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.34 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.34 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.