Gulliver 54

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.70 UTI
0.55
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.38
CC3
0.79
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 7.4 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.55 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.38 Low quality
  • Clit 0.79 Well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Gulliver 54 is a moderately populated, very dense object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 81.261 33.693 0.813 -0.509 -7.22 14.053
Li et al. 2025 81.297 33.688 0.791 -0.595 -7.299 –
Almeida et al. 2025 81.271 33.696 – – – –
Zhang et al. 2024 81.272 33.678 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 81.272 33.678 0.82 -0.507 -7.265 6.031
Cavallo et al. 2024 81.278 33.706 0.822 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 81.272 33.678 0.82 -0.507 -7.265 6.031
He et al. 2022 81.251 33.703 0.832 -0.478 -7.223 –
Tarricq et al. 2022 81.247 33.69 0.841 -0.506 -7.248 –
Dias et al. 2021 81.271 33.696 0.777 -0.605 -7.245 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 81.297 33.688 0.791 -0.595 -7.299 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 81.297 33.688 0.791 -0.595 -7.299 –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 81.297 33.688 – – – 2.951
Soubiran et al. 2018 81.297 33.688 – – – 16.77
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 81.297 33.688 0.791 -0.595 -7.299 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 1.13 0.66 – 422 -0.047 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.21 0.88 – 253 – 103 – –
Zhang et al. 2024 – – – – -0.192* – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 175* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.14 0.71 – 347 0.050 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.19 0.70 1.15 369 – – – –
He et al. 2022 – 0.70 – 355 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 1.15 – – 302 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 1.21 0.88 – 253 -0.151 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.19 0.40 – 282 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.22 – – – – – – –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 1.19 0.52 – 419 0.017 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 1.22 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.22 – – – – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸