Gulliver 52
0.76
UTI
0.68
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
5.7 [arcmin]
- CN 0.68 Moderately populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Gulliver 52 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 161.646 | -59.507 | 0.403 | -4.748 | 1.498 | -16.807 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 161.669 | -59.508 | 0.396 | -4.755 | 1.47 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 161.832 | -59.519 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 161.607 | -59.485 | 0.408 | -4.749 | 1.506 | -17.609 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 161.737 | -59.523 | 0.409 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 161.607 | -59.485 | 0.408 | -4.749 | 1.506 | -17.609 |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 161.669 | -59.508 | 0.396 | -4.755 | 1.47 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 161.832 | -59.519 | 0.396 | -4.753 | 1.466 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 161.669 | -59.508 | 0.396 | -4.755 | 1.47 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 161.669 | -59.508 | 0.396 | -4.755 | 1.47 | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 161.669 | -59.508 | â | â | â | 2.625 |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 161.669 | -59.508 | â | â | â | -11.33 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 161.669 | -59.508 | 0.396 | -4.755 | 1.47 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 2.01 | 1.24 | â | 605 | 0.010 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.09 | 1.54 | â | 236 | â | 294 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 369* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.29 | 1.37 | â | 339 | 0.200 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.22 | 1.38 | 0.91 | 103 | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 2.35 | 1.55 | â | 214 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.09 | 1.54 | â | 236 | 0.103 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.48 | 1.04 | â | 479 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.35 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 2.42 | 1.57 | â | 214 | 0.019 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.35 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.35 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.