Gulliver 52

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.76 UTI
0.68
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 5.7 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.68 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Gulliver 52 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 161.646 -59.507 0.403 -4.748 1.498 -16.807
Li et al. 2025 161.669 -59.508 0.396 -4.755 1.47 –
Almeida et al. 2025 161.832 -59.519 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 161.607 -59.485 0.408 -4.749 1.506 -17.609
Cavallo et al. 2024 161.737 -59.523 0.409 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 161.607 -59.485 0.408 -4.749 1.506 -17.609
Rain et al. 2021 161.669 -59.508 0.396 -4.755 1.47 –
Dias et al. 2021 161.832 -59.519 0.396 -4.753 1.466 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 161.669 -59.508 0.396 -4.755 1.47 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 161.669 -59.508 0.396 -4.755 1.47 –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 161.669 -59.508 – – – 2.625
Soubiran et al. 2018 161.669 -59.508 – – – -11.33
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 161.669 -59.508 0.396 -4.755 1.47 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 2.01 1.24 – 605 0.010 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 2.09 1.54 – 236 – 294 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 369* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.29 1.37 – 339 0.200 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.22 1.38 0.91 103 – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 2.35 1.55 – 214 – – – 0
Dias et al. 2021 2.09 1.54 – 236 0.103 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.48 1.04 – 479 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.35 – – – – – – –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 2.42 1.57 – 214 0.019 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 2.35 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.35 – – – – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸