Gulliver 50

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.74 UTI
0.63
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.65
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 4.3 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.63 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.65 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Gulliver 50 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 181.366 -62.683 0.546 -7.205 1.676 -27.374
Li et al. 2025 181.362 -62.678 0.514 -7.204 1.663 –
Almeida et al. 2025 181.382 -62.667 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 181.361 -62.686 0.546 -7.204 1.668 -27.516
Cavallo et al. 2024 181.392 -62.676 0.547 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 181.361 -62.686 0.546 -7.204 1.668 -27.516
Almeida et al. 2023 181.347 -62.68 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 181.382 -62.667 0.523 -7.201 1.667 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 181.362 -62.678 0.514 -7.204 1.663 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 181.362 -62.678 0.514 -7.204 1.663 –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 181.362 -62.678 – – – 2.149
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 181.362 -62.678 0.514 -7.204 1.663 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 1.40 0.92 – 349 -0.339 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.72 1.08 – 55 – 321 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 395* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.71 0.85 – 427 0.020 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.73 0.73 0.96 210 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.66 1.08 – 105 0.054 421* 0.51 –
Dias et al. 2021 1.72 1.08 – 55 0.207 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.73 0.94 – 41 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.84 – – – – – – –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 1.64 1.20 – 67 0.011 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.84 – – – – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸