Gulliver 50

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.72 UTI
0.63
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.6
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 14.5 [N/pc2]
  • CN 0.63 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.6 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Gulliver 50 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 181.366 -62.683 0.546 -7.205 1.676 -27.374
Li et al. 2025 181.362 -62.678 0.514 -7.204 1.663 –
Almeida et al. 2025 181.382 -62.667 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 181.361 -62.686 0.546 -7.204 1.668 -27.516
Cavallo et al. 2024 181.392 -62.676 0.547 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 181.361 -62.686 0.546 -7.204 1.668 -27.516
Almeida et al. 2023 181.347 -62.68 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 181.382 -62.667 0.523 -7.201 1.667 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 181.362 -62.678 0.514 -7.204 1.663 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 181.362 -62.678 0.514 -7.204 1.663 –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 181.362 -62.678 – – – 2.149
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 181.362 -62.678 0.514 -7.204 1.663 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.72 1.01 0.96 86 0.020 395 0.51 –
Li et al. 2025 1.40 0.92 – 349 -0.339 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.72 1.08 – 55 – 321 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 395(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.71 0.85 – 427 0.020 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.73 0.73 0.96 210 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.66 1.08 – 105 0.054 421(1) 0.51 –
Dias et al. 2021 1.72 1.08 – 55 0.207 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.73 0.94 – 41 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.84 – – – – – – –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 1.64 1.20 – 67 0.011 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.84 – – – – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸