Gulliver 50
0.74
UTI
0.63
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.65
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
4.3 [arcmin]
- CN 0.63 Moderately populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.65 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Gulliver 50 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 181.366 | -62.683 | 0.546 | -7.205 | 1.676 | -27.374 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 181.362 | -62.678 | 0.514 | -7.204 | 1.663 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 181.382 | -62.667 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 181.361 | -62.686 | 0.546 | -7.204 | 1.668 | -27.516 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 181.392 | -62.676 | 0.547 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 181.361 | -62.686 | 0.546 | -7.204 | 1.668 | -27.516 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 181.347 | -62.68 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 181.382 | -62.667 | 0.523 | -7.201 | 1.667 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 181.362 | -62.678 | 0.514 | -7.204 | 1.663 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 181.362 | -62.678 | 0.514 | -7.204 | 1.663 | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 181.362 | -62.678 | â | â | â | 2.149 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 181.362 | -62.678 | 0.514 | -7.204 | 1.663 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.40 | 0.92 | â | 349 | -0.339 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.72 | 1.08 | â | 55 | â | 321 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 395* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.71 | 0.85 | â | 427 | 0.020 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.73 | 0.73 | 0.96 | 210 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.66 | 1.08 | â | 105 | 0.054 | 421* | 0.51 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.72 | 1.08 | â | 55 | 0.207 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.73 | 0.94 | â | 41 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.84 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 1.64 | 1.20 | â | 67 | 0.011 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.84 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.