Gulliver 5
0.76
UTI
0.59
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.6
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
4.9 [arcmin]
- CN 0.59 Moderately populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 0.6 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Gulliver 5 is a moderately populated, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Very young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 132.602 | -45.515 | 0.429 | -5.067 | 4.942 | -121.976 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 132.61 | -45.492 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 132.571 | -45.519 | 0.432 | -5.044 | 4.967 | -46.929 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 132.447 | -45.482 | 0.432 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 132.571 | -45.519 | 0.432 | -5.044 | 4.967 | -46.929 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 132.601 | -45.49 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 132.61 | -45.492 | 0.404 | -5.108 | 4.912 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 132.626 | -45.509 | 0.406 | -5.102 | 4.904 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 132.626 | -45.509 | 0.406 | -5.102 | 4.904 | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 132.626 | -45.509 | â | â | â | 2.476 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 132.626 | -45.509 | 0.406 | -5.102 | 4.904 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.27 | 2.01 | â | 7 | â | 208 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 812* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.49 | 2.06 | â | 9 | 0.370 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.14 | 2.07 | 2.64 | 9 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 2.05 | 2.12 | â | 12 | 0.075 | 394* | 0.72 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.27 | 2.01 | â | 7 | 0.069 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.14 | 1.50 | â | 38 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.30 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 2.52 | 2.00 | â | 14 | 0.027 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.30 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.
Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: worst fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.