Gulliver 48

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.77 UTI
0.72
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 12.3 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.72 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Gulliver 48 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Young

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Silver sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 316.351 50.746 1.066 -4.784 -6.718 -18.355
Li et al. 2025 316.334 50.733 1.058 -4.781 -6.671 –
Alfonso et al. 2024 316.513 50.69 1.038 -4.769 -6.656 –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 316.304 50.741 1.056 -4.772 -6.699 -4.923
Celli et al. 2024 316.334 50.733 – – – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 316.329 50.725 1.066 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 316.304 50.741 1.056 -4.772 -6.699 -4.923
He et al. 2022 316.303 50.737 1.069 -4.778 -6.717 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 316.334 50.733 1.058 -4.781 -6.671 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 316.334 50.733 1.058 -4.781 -6.671 –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 316.334 50.733 – – – 2.624
Soubiran et al. 2018 316.334 50.733 – – – -26.67
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 316.334 50.733 1.058 -4.781 -6.671 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 0.67 2.68 – 212 0.037 – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 1.04 2.87 – 41 0.010 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 597* – –
Celli et al. 2024 – – – 18 – 640 – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.24 3.32 – 32 0.690 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.90 3.40 2.79 38 – – – –
He et al. 2022 – 3.40 – 20 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.04 2.87 – 18 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.92 – – – – – – –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 0.89 2.40 – 210 0.015 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 0.92 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 0.92 – – – – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸