Gulliver 40
0.70
UTI
0.35
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
3.9 [arcmin]
- CN 0.35 Poorly populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Gulliver 40 is a poorly populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 163.094 | -58.394 | 0.62 | -7.71 | 2.496 | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 163.095 | -58.394 | 0.589 | -7.686 | 2.476 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 163.1 | -58.4 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 163.053 | -58.385 | 0.622 | -7.733 | 2.519 | -17.807 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 163.115 | -58.413 | 0.621 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 163.053 | -58.385 | 0.622 | -7.733 | 2.519 | -17.807 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 163.098 | -58.412 | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 163.095 | -58.394 | 0.589 | -7.686 | 2.476 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 163.1 | -58.4 | 0.598 | -7.691 | 2.479 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 163.095 | -58.394 | 0.589 | -7.686 | 2.476 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 163.095 | -58.394 | 0.589 | -7.686 | 2.476 | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 163.095 | -58.394 | â | â | â | 2.342 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 163.095 | -58.394 | 0.589 | -7.686 | 2.476 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.51 | 0.58 | â | 234 | 0.011 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.58 | 0.82 | â | 33 | â | 132 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 228* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.40 | 0.70 | â | 162 | 0.160 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.56 | 0.60 | 0.87 | 96 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.52 | 0.67 | â | 80 | 0.151 | 131* | 0.46 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 1.62 | 0.78 | â | 174 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.58 | 0.82 | â | 33 | 0.133 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.65 | 0.64 | â | 42 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.62 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 1.47 | 0.79 | â | 175 | 0.010 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.62 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.