Gulliver 40

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.70 UTI
0.35
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 3.9 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.35 Poorly populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Gulliver 40 is a poorly populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 163.094 -58.394 0.62 -7.71 2.496 –
Li et al. 2025 163.095 -58.394 0.589 -7.686 2.476 –
Almeida et al. 2025 163.1 -58.4 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 163.053 -58.385 0.622 -7.733 2.519 -17.807
Cavallo et al. 2024 163.115 -58.413 0.621 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 163.053 -58.385 0.622 -7.733 2.519 -17.807
Almeida et al. 2023 163.098 -58.412 – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 163.095 -58.394 0.589 -7.686 2.476 –
Dias et al. 2021 163.1 -58.4 0.598 -7.691 2.479 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 163.095 -58.394 0.589 -7.686 2.476 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 163.095 -58.394 0.589 -7.686 2.476 –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 163.095 -58.394 – – – 2.342
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 163.095 -58.394 0.589 -7.686 2.476 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 1.51 0.58 – 234 0.011 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.58 0.82 – 33 – 132 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 228* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.40 0.70 – 162 0.160 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.56 0.60 0.87 96 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.52 0.67 – 80 0.151 131* 0.46 –
Rain et al. 2021 1.62 0.78 – 174 – – – 0
Dias et al. 2021 1.58 0.82 – 33 0.133 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.65 0.64 – 42 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.62 – – – – – – –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 1.47 0.79 – 175 0.010 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.62 – – – – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸