Gulliver 36

(FoF 2086)

0.64 UTI

0.77

C_N

0.66

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

0.52

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 141

Core radius and density 1.6 [pc], 3.3 [pc^-2]

C3 classification AB

C_N 0.77 Rich
C_dens 0.66 Moderately dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 0.52 Moderately studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Gulliver 36 is a rich, moderately dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

Note: This object shares a significant percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.

Relatively close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.96 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.96 (50th percentile).

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.2907, e_all=0.0546.

Rain et al. (2021)
This cluster was not include in (Dias et al., 2002A&A...389..871D, Cat. B/ocl), parameters log(t)=8.813, E(b-v)=0.181 and Z=0.040 are from Monteiro & Dias (2019MNRAS.487.2385M).

Data

🔍 Search references for Gulliver 36 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	123.181	-35.102	0.74	-0.239	0.656	9.641
Li et al.	2025	123.185	-35.111	0.725	-0.236	0.609	–
Almeida et al.	2025	123.213	-35.127	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	123.156	-35.097	0.738	-0.237	0.661	9.306
Cavallo et al.	2024	123.179	-35.087	0.736	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	123.156	-35.097	0.738	-0.237	0.661	9.306
Almeida et al.	2023	123.223	-35.121	–	–	–	–
Tarricq et al.	2022	123.088	-35.101	0.739	-0.24	0.654	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	123.185	-35.111	–	–	–	–
Rain et al.	2021	123.185	-35.111	0.725	-0.236	0.609	–
Dias et al.	2021	123.213	-35.127	0.732	-0.238	0.603	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	123.185	-35.111	0.725	-0.236	0.609	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	123.185	-35.111	0.725	-0.236	0.609	–
Liu & Pang	2019	123.188	-35.089	0.728	-0.251	0.605	–
Monteiro & Dias	2019	123.185	-35.111	–	–	–	2.864
Bossini et al.	2019	123.185	-35.111	–	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	123.185	-35.111	–	–	–	10.22
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	123.185	-35.111	0.725	-0.236	0.609	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.31	0.71	1.91	698	0.000	380	0.65	0
Li et al.	2025	1.32	0.94	–	698	-0.036	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	1.24	0.71	–	724	–	295	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	1.29	0.82	1.91	607	–	572⁽¹⁾	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	1.47	1.20	–	490	0.170	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	1.29	0.82	1.91	607	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2023	1.28	0.97	–	706	-0.080	260⁽¹⁾	0.65	–
Tarricq et al.	2022	1.27	–	–	776	–	–	–	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	1.31	0.47	–	741	–	464	–	0⁽¹⁾
Rain et al.	2021	1.33	0.16	–	646	–	–	–	0
Dias et al.	2021	1.24	0.71	–	724	0.065	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	1.31	0.47	–	741	–	–	–	–
Kounkel et al.	2020	1.34	0.97	–	562	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	1.33	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Liu & Pang	2019	–	–	–	661	0.000	–	–	–
Monteiro & Dias	2019	1.35	0.57	–	650	0.040	–	–	–
Bossini et al.	2019	1.19	0.36	–	1130	0.000	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	1.33	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	1.33	–	–	–	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Cluster	%	RA	DEC	Plx	pmRA	pmDE	Rv	UTI
CWWDL 6647	56.0	123.16	-35.1	0.74	-0.24	0.66	6.81	0.0

💡 Note: The % column shows the percentage of members that Gulliver 36 shares with each listed object.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3