Gulliver 35

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.81 UTI
0.64
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 4.3 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.64 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Gulliver 35 is a moderately populated, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption, age, and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 150.359 -58.198 0.429 -6.941 4.006 -12.245
Li et al. 2025 150.379 -58.198 0.405 -6.973 3.967 –
Almeida et al. 2025 150.35 -58.191 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 150.379 -58.206 0.43 -6.952 4.004 -12.163
Cavallo et al. 2024 150.338 -58.181 0.43 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 150.379 -58.206 0.43 -6.952 4.004 -12.163
Almeida et al. 2023 150.345 -58.198 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 150.35 -58.191 0.411 -6.961 3.982 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 150.379 -58.198 0.405 -6.973 3.967 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 150.379 -58.198 0.405 -6.973 3.967 –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 150.379 -58.198 – – – 2.984
Soubiran et al. 2018 150.379 -58.198 – – – 86.46
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 150.379 -58.198 0.405 -6.973 3.967 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 1.24 0.01 – 562 -0.045 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 2.13 1.32 – 69 – 146 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 479* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.06 0.91 – 447 0.580 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.12 1.33 1.55 106 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 2.02 1.34 – 123 0.058 281* 0.63 –
Dias et al. 2021 2.13 1.32 – 69 0.267 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.37 1.05 – 155 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.30 – – – – – – –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 2.27 1.08 – 101 0.015 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 2.30 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.30 – – – – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸