Gulliver 35

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.79 UTI
0.64
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.65
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 9.0 [N/pc2]
  • CN 0.64 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 0.65 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Gulliver 35 is a moderately populated, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption, age, and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 150.359 -58.198 0.429 -6.941 4.006 -12.245
Li et al. 2025 150.379 -58.198 0.405 -6.973 3.967 –
Almeida et al. 2025 150.35 -58.191 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 150.379 -58.206 0.43 -6.952 4.004 -12.163
Cavallo et al. 2024 150.338 -58.181 0.43 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 150.379 -58.206 0.43 -6.952 4.004 -12.163
Almeida et al. 2023 150.345 -58.198 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 150.35 -58.191 0.411 -6.961 3.982 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 150.379 -58.198 0.405 -6.973 3.967 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 150.379 -58.198 0.405 -6.973 3.967 –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 150.379 -58.198 – – – 2.984
Soubiran et al. 2018 150.379 -58.198 – – – 86.46
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 150.379 -58.198 0.405 -6.973 3.967 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 2.13 1.2 1.55 114 0.058 281 0.63 –
Li et al. 2025 1.24 0.01 – 562 -0.045 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 2.13 1.32 – 69 – 146 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 479(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.06 0.91 – 447 0.580 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.12 1.33 1.55 106 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 2.02 1.34 – 123 0.058 281(1) 0.63 –
Dias et al. 2021 2.13 1.32 – 69 0.267 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.37 1.05 – 155 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.30 – – – – – – –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 2.27 1.08 – 101 0.015 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 2.30 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.30 – – – – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸