Gulliver 33
0.77
UTI
0.71
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
9.7 [arcmin]
- CN 0.71 Moderately populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Gulliver 33 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 318.259 | 46.359 | 0.875 | 0.303 | -4.007 | -35.775 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 318.159 | 46.345 | 0.867 | 0.274 | -3.959 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 318.093 | 46.332 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 318.233 | 46.366 | 0.874 | 0.293 | -4.022 | -25.878 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 318.11 | 46.265 | 0.873 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 318.233 | 46.366 | 0.874 | 0.293 | -4.022 | -25.878 |
| He et al. | 2022 | 318.227 | 46.363 | 0.884 | 0.303 | -4.016 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 318.093 | 46.332 | 0.865 | 0.291 | -3.968 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 318.159 | 46.345 | 0.867 | 0.274 | -3.959 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 318.159 | 46.345 | 0.867 | 0.274 | -3.959 | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 318.159 | 46.345 | â | â | â | 2.511 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 318.159 | 46.345 | 0.867 | 0.274 | -3.959 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.08 | 0.98 | â | 157 | -0.038 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.09 | 1.22 | â | 52 | â | 316 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 342* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.21 | 1.48 | â | 69 | -0.020 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.10 | 1.49 | 2.26 | 68 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 1.70 | â | 45 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 1.08 | â | â | 50 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.09 | 1.22 | â | 52 | 0.130 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.11 | 0.69 | â | 48 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.12 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 1.21 | 1.33 | â | 25 | 0.011 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.12 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.