Gulliver 32

0.46 UTI

0.58

C_N

0.46

C_dens

0.5

C_C3

0.39

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 66

Core radius and density 1.6 [pc], 2.3 [pc^-2]

C3 classification BB

C_N 0.58 Moderately populated
C_dens 0.46 Loose
C_C3 0.5 Intermediate quality
C_lit 0.39 Poorly studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Gulliver 32 is a moderately populated, loose object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Palma et al. (2025)
Classified as optical pair P393, along with PHOC_24.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.94 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.94 (50th percentile).

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.1973, e_all=0.2819.

Data

🔍 Search references for Gulliver 32 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	98.383	7.478	0.558	-0.95	2.284	40.902
Yang et al.	2025	98.384	7.466	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	98.38	7.499	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	98.384	7.466	0.56	-0.947	2.281	40.781
Cavallo et al.	2024	98.384	7.494	0.567	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	98.384	7.466	0.56	-0.947	2.281	40.781
Almeida et al.	2023	98.388	7.5	–	–	–	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	98.383	7.478	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	98.38	7.499	0.589	-0.909	2.32	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	98.383	7.478	0.577	-0.879	2.304	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	98.383	7.478	0.577	-0.879	2.304	–
Monteiro & Dias	2019	98.383	7.478	–	–	–	2.439
Soubiran et al.	2018	98.383	7.478	–	–	–	40.24
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	98.383	7.478	0.577	-0.879	2.304	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.67	1.07	1.74	468	-0.070	189	0.52	0
Yang et al.	2025	–	–	–	457	-0.070⁽³⁾	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	1.67	1.64	–	340	–	179	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	1.67	0.98	1.74	460	–	236⁽¹⁾	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	1.85	1.16	–	468	0.400	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	1.67	0.98	1.74	460	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2023	1.63	1.55	–	546	-0.164	181⁽¹⁾	0.52	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	1.69	0.73	–	1288	–	197	–	0⁽¹⁾
Dias et al.	2021	1.67	1.64	–	340	-0.166	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	1.69	0.73	–	1288	–	–	–	–
Kounkel et al.	2020	1.75	1.23	–	550	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	1.65	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Monteiro & Dias	2019	1.39	0.81	–	713	0.032	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	1.65	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	1.65	–	–	–	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3